McGuire Thomas G
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02116, USA.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):35-7; discussion 69-70. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181c9fb54.
This commentary on R. F. Averill et al. (2010) addresses their idea of risk and quality adjusting fee-for-service payments to primary care physicians in order to improve the efficiency of primary care and take a step toward financing a "medical home"for patients. I show how their idea can create incentives for efficient practice styles. Pairing this with an active beneficiary choice of primary care physician with an enrollment fee would make the idea easier to implement and provide an incentive and the financing for elements of service not covered by procedure-based fees.
这篇对R. F. 埃弗里尔等人(2010年)文章的评论,探讨了他们关于对初级保健医生的按服务收费进行风险和质量调整的想法,目的是提高初级保健的效率,并朝着为患者资助“医疗之家”迈出一步。我展示了他们的想法如何能够为高效的执业方式创造激励机制。将这一想法与让受益方通过缴纳注册费来积极选择初级保健医生相结合,将使该想法更易于实施,并为基于诊疗项目收费未涵盖的服务内容提供激励和资金支持。