Department of Clinical, Social, and Administrative Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Jan;30(1):111. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.1.111.
Methotrexate, administered for treatment of pediatric and adult malignancies, is a direct renal toxin, which can lead to renal dysfunction, decreased methotrexate clearance, elevated methotrexate concentrations, and systemic toxicity. Although plasma methotrexate concentrations have been shown to decline precipitously after a single dose of glucarpidase, this drug is investigational and available only through compassionate use. Therefore, alternative treatments for methotrexate removal may be required. We describe a 13-year-old girl (body surface area 1.2 m(2)) with osteosarcoma who was treated with high-dose methotrexate 12 g/m(2) infused over 4 hours. Forty-eight hours after the infusion, her plasma methotrexate concentrations were elevated at 446 micromol/L. She exhibited severe signs of methotrexate toxicity, including encephalopathy, liver failure, and acute kidney injury, and could not tolerate conventional hemodialysis. Over the next 12 days, the patient was treated with continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD), continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), and glucarpidase to enhance methotrexate elimination. Compared with standard CVVHD, SPAD did not significantly increase methotrexate removal as measured by elimination half-life and methotrexate saturation coefficient. The highest clearance rate among extracorporeal therapies was achieved by CVVHDF, with an effluent rate of 4950 ml/hour. The patient's clinical condition steadily improved, and all extracorporeal therapies were stopped 168 hours after methotrexate administration. The patient was discharged home and continued with chemotherapy, including methotrexate, which was dosed based on iothalamate glomerular filtration rates on the day before infusion. Although extracorporeal treatments appeared to enhance methotrexate clearance, the administration of glucarpidase resulted in the most rapid percentage decline (86%) in methotrexate concentration. Until glucarpidase is readily available, intermittent hemodialysis should be used to enhance methotrexate clearance. If the patient is unable to tolerate hemodialysis, use of CVVHDF with maximum effluent rates will enhance methotrexate clearance.
甲氨蝶呤用于治疗儿科和成人恶性肿瘤,是一种直接的肾毒素,可导致肾功能障碍、甲氨蝶呤清除率降低、甲氨蝶呤浓度升高和全身毒性。虽然已经证明单次使用粘菌素酶后血浆中甲氨蝶呤浓度会急剧下降,但该药仍处于研究阶段,只能通过同情用药获得。因此,可能需要其他方法来去除甲氨蝶呤。我们描述了一例 13 岁女孩(体表面积 1.2 m²)患有骨肉瘤,接受了 12 g/m² 的大剂量甲氨蝶呤 4 小时输注。输注后 48 小时,她的血浆中甲氨蝶呤浓度升高至 446 μmol/L。她表现出严重的甲氨蝶呤毒性迹象,包括脑病、肝功能衰竭和急性肾损伤,无法耐受常规血液透析。在接下来的 12 天里,患者接受了连续静脉-静脉血液透析(CVVHD)、单次通过白蛋白透析(SPAD)、连续静脉-静脉血液透析滤过(CVVHDF)和粘菌素酶治疗,以增强甲氨蝶呤的清除。与标准 CVVHD 相比,SPAD 并没有显著增加甲氨蝶呤的清除率,表现在消除半衰期和甲氨蝶呤饱和度系数上。在外周治疗中,CVVHDF 的清除率最高,达到 4950 ml/h。患者的临床状况稳步改善,在甲氨蝶呤给药后 168 小时停止了所有外周治疗。患者出院回家并继续接受化疗,包括甲氨蝶呤,根据输注前一天碘海醇肾小球滤过率给药。尽管体外治疗似乎增强了甲氨蝶呤的清除,但粘菌素酶的给药导致甲氨蝶呤浓度的下降幅度最大(86%)。在粘菌素酶广泛应用之前,应间歇性进行血液透析以增强甲氨蝶呤的清除率。如果患者无法耐受血液透析,则应使用最大流速的 CVVHDF 来增强甲氨蝶呤的清除率。