• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉双功能超声速度测量与血管内超声在检测颈动脉支架内再狭窄中的比较。

Carotid duplex ultrasound velocity measurements versus intravascular ultrasound in detecting carotid in-stent restenosis.

机构信息

Section of Vascular Medicine, Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass 02114, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Oct;2(5):438-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.857276. Epub 2009 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.857276
PMID:20031754
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Duplex ultrasonography criteria for assessing the severity of carotid artery (CA) in-stent restenosis are not well established.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed 39 patients (40 CAs) who underwent CA stenting with baseline and 6-month follow-up carotid duplex ultrasonography and intravascular ultrasound. Intravascular ultrasound measurements included minimum luminal diameter, percent diameter, and lumen area stenosis. Duplex ultrasonography measurements included peak systolic velocity (PSV), percentage change in PSV, end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and internal-to-common CA PSV ratio (ICA/CCA). Receiver operating characteristic curves assessed each duplex measurement to detect >or=50% diameter, >or=75% lumen area stenosis, and minimum luminal diameter <3 mm at follow-up. At 6-month intravascular ultrasound follow-up, >or=50% diameter and >or=75% lumen area CA in-stent restenosis occurred in 20% and 25%, respectively; minimum luminal diameter <3 cm occurred in 48%. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves for PSV, EDV, and ICA/CCA were 0.85, 0.96, and 0.89 for >or=50% diameter stenosis and 0.89, 0.93, and 0.88 for >or=75% lumen area stenosis, respectively. Optimal PSV, EDV, and ICA/CCA criteria to detect >or=50% diameter and >or=75% lumen area CA in-stent restenosis were greater compared with those for native CA. A >98% increase in PSV had the highest specificity, whereas the combination of EDV >41 cm/s and ICA/CCA >2 had the highest sensitivity in detecting >or=75% lumen area CA in-stent restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

PSV, EDV, and ICA/CCA PSV ratio were good discriminators for detecting significant diameter and lumen area greater compared with those for native CA. The combination of duplex velocity criteria increases diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

背景

评估颈动脉(CA)支架内再狭窄严重程度的双功能超声标准尚未确立。

方法和结果

我们分析了 39 例(40 例 CA)接受 CA 支架置入术的患者,这些患者在基线和 6 个月时进行了颈动脉双功能超声和血管内超声检查。血管内超声测量包括最小管腔直径、直径百分比和管腔面积狭窄。双功能超声测量包括收缩期峰值速度(PSV)、PSV 百分比变化、舒张末期速度(EDV)和颈内动脉/颈总动脉 PSV 比值(ICA/CCA)。受试者工作特征曲线评估了每种双功能超声测量方法,以检测随访时直径>或=50%、管腔面积>或=75%狭窄和最小管腔直径<3mm。在 6 个月的血管内超声随访中,分别有 20%和 25%的患者发生直径>或=50%和>或=75%的 CA 支架内再狭窄,48%的患者发生最小管腔直径<3cm。PSV、EDV 和 ICA/CCA 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积对于直径>或=50%狭窄分别为 0.85、0.96 和 0.89,对于管腔面积>或=75%狭窄分别为 0.89、0.93 和 0.88。检测直径>或=50%和>或=75%的 CA 支架内再狭窄的最佳 PSV、EDV 和 ICA/CCA 标准与检测天然 CA 的标准相比更大。PSV 增加>98%具有最高的特异性,而 EDV>41cm/s 和 ICA/CCA>2 的组合在检测>或=75%的 CA 支架内再狭窄的管腔面积方面具有最高的敏感性。

结论

PSV、EDV 和 ICA/CCA PSV 比值是检测与天然 CA 相比具有显著直径和管腔面积狭窄的良好鉴别指标。双功能超声速度标准的组合可提高诊断准确性。

相似文献

1
Carotid duplex ultrasound velocity measurements versus intravascular ultrasound in detecting carotid in-stent restenosis.颈动脉双功能超声速度测量与血管内超声在检测颈动脉支架内再狭窄中的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Oct;2(5):438-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.857276. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
2
Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.支架置入后颈动脉的双功超声速度标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.038.
3
Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria?颈动脉支架置入术:是否需要修订超声速度标准?
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jan;39(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.10.043.
4
Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis.用于定义颈动脉支架内再狭窄严重程度的最佳颈动脉双功超声速度标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Sep;48(3):589-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
5
Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria.通过双功超声标准确定颈动脉支架内狭窄情况。
J Endovasc Ther. 2005 Jun;12(3):346-53. doi: 10.1583/04-1527.1.
6
Ultrasound criteria for severe in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后严重支架内再狭窄的超声标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.031.
7
Critical appraisal of the Carotid Duplex Consensus criteria in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉双功能超声共识标准在诊断颈动脉狭窄中的评价。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;53(1):53-9; discussion 59-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.045. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
8
Carotid duplex velocity criteria revisited for the diagnosis of carotid in-stent restenosis.重新审视用于诊断颈动脉支架内再狭窄的颈动脉双功超声速度标准。
Vascular. 2007 May-Jun;15(3):119-25. doi: 10.2310/6670.2007.00030.
9
Ultrasound velocity criteria for carotid in-stent restenosis.颈动脉支架内再狭窄的超声速度标准。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Feb 15;69(3):349-54. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21032.
10
Grading carotid intrastent restenosis: a 6-year follow-up study.颈动脉支架置入术后再狭窄的分级:一项6年随访研究。
Stroke. 2008 Apr;39(4):1189-96. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.497487. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Usefulness of Carotid Ultrasonography for Risk Stratification of Cerebral and Cardiovascular Disease.颈动脉超声在脑心脑血管疾病风险分层中的作用。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2020 Oct 1;27(10):1023-1035. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17044. Epub 2020 Aug 29.