Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Swiss Institute for Dryland Environmental Research, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede-Boqer Campus, 84990 Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel.
Int J Parasitol. 2010 Jun;40(7):807-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
Different host species harbour parasite faunas that are anywhere from very similar to very different in species composition. A priori, the similarity in the parasite faunas of any two host species should decrease with increases in either the phylogenetic distance, the distinctness of the environments occupied or the geographical distance between these hosts. We tested these predictions using extensive data on the faunas of fleas (Insecta: Siphonaptera) and gamasid mites (Acari: Parasitiformes) parasitic on rodents across the Palaearctic. For each pair of host species, we computed the similarity in parasite faunas based on both species composition as well as the phylogenetic and/or taxonomic distinctness of parasite species. Phylogenetic distances between hosts were based on patristic distances through a rodent phylogeny, geographic distances were computed from geographic range data, and environmental dissimilarity was measured from the average climatic and vegetation scores of each host range. Using multiple regressions on distance matrices to assess the separate explanatory power of each of the three dependent variables, environmental dissimilarity between the ranges of host species emerged as the best predictor of dissimilarity between parasite faunas, especially for fleas; in the case of mites, phylogenetic distance between host species was also important. A closer look at the data indicates that the flea and mite faunas of two hosts inhabiting different environments are always different, whilst hosts living in similar environments can have either very similar or dissimilar parasite faunas. Additional tests showed that dissimilarity in flea or mite faunas between host geographic ranges was best explained by dissimilarity in vegetation, followed by dissimilarity in climatic conditions. Thus, external environmental factors may play greater roles than commonly thought in the evolution of host-parasite associations.
不同的宿主物种拥有的寄生虫区系在物种组成上既有非常相似的,也有非常不同的。根据先验知识,任何两个宿主物种的寄生虫区系相似性应该随着种系发生距离、所占据环境的明显差异或这些宿主之间的地理距离的增加而降低。我们使用了广泛的数据来检验这些预测,这些数据涉及寄生在古北界啮齿动物身上的跳蚤(昆虫纲:蚤目)和革螨(蛛形纲:真螨目)的区系。对于每一对宿主物种,我们根据物种组成以及寄生虫物种的系统发生和/或分类学差异来计算寄生虫区系的相似性。宿主之间的系统发生距离基于通过啮齿动物系统发育得出的亲源距离,地理距离根据地理范围数据计算,环境差异程度则通过每个宿主范围的平均气候和植被得分来衡量。我们使用距离矩阵上的多元回归来评估三个依赖变量中的每一个的单独解释能力,结果表明,宿主物种范围之间的环境差异是区分寄生虫区系差异的最佳预测因子,这一点在跳蚤中尤为明显;在螨类中,宿主物种之间的系统发生距离也很重要。对数据的进一步分析表明,栖息在不同环境中的两个宿主的跳蚤和螨类区系总是不同的,而生活在相似环境中的宿主可能具有非常相似或不同的寄生虫区系。进一步的测试表明,宿主地理范围之间跳蚤或螨类区系的差异最好用植被的差异来解释,其次是气候条件的差异。因此,外部环境因素在宿主-寄生虫关系的进化中可能比通常认为的更为重要。