Miranda C P, Lehmann K G, Lachterman B, Coodley E M, Froelicher V F
Long Beach Veterans Affairs Medical Center, California.
Ann Intern Med. 1991 Apr 15;114(8):649-56. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-8-649.
To compare angina and ST-segment depression during exercise testing, as markers for coronary artery disease.
Retrospective analysis of exercise test responses and cardiac catheterization results.
A U.S. Veterans Affairs medical center.
Four hundred and sixteen men who were referred for the evaluation of symptoms, postmyocardial infarction testing, or both. Two hundred patients had no clinical or electrocardiographic evidence of previous myocardial infarction, whereas 216 were survivors of a previous myocardial infarction.
All patients did a standard exercise test and had diagnostic coronary angiography with ventriculography within an average of 32 days (range, 0 to 90 days) of their exercise test.
Two hundred patients without a previous myocardial infarction were divided into four groups: the no ischemia group had 80 patients; the angina pectoris only group had 23 patients; the silent ischemia group had 40 patients; and the ST-segment depression and angina pectoris group had 57 patients. In patients without a previous myocardial infarction, exercise-induced ST-segment depression was a better marker than exercise-induced angina for the presence of any coronary artery disease (P less than 0.005). Patients with symptomatic exercise-induced ischemia had a higher prevalence of severe coronary artery disease than did those with only silent ischemia (30% compared with 20%; 95% CI, - 7.3% to 27.0%; P = 0.005). For the 216 survivors of a myocardial infarction, divided into the same four groups, ST-segment depression again was a better marker for the presence of severe coronary artery disease compared with angina alone (P = 0.08). The prevalence rates of severe coronary artery disease in the no ischemia plus myocardial infarction group, the angina pectoris only plus myocardial infarction group, the silent ischemia plus myocardial infarction group, and the ST-segment depression and angina pectoris plus myocardial infarction group were 10%, 9%, 23%, and 32%, respectively (P less than 0.01).
Exercise-induced ST-segment depression is a better marker for coronary artery disease than is exercise-induced angina. Symptomatic ischemia during the exercise test is a better marker for severe coronary artery disease than is silent ischemia.
比较运动试验期间的心绞痛和ST段压低作为冠状动脉疾病的标志物。
对运动试验反应和心脏导管检查结果进行回顾性分析。
美国退伍军人事务医疗中心。
416名因症状评估、心肌梗死后检查或两者均有而被转诊的男性。200名患者无既往心肌梗死的临床或心电图证据,而216名是既往心肌梗死的幸存者。
所有患者均进行标准运动试验,并在运动试验后平均32天(范围0至90天)内进行诊断性冠状动脉造影及心室造影。
200名无既往心肌梗死的患者分为四组:无缺血组80例;仅心绞痛组23例;无症状性缺血组40例;ST段压低和心绞痛组57例。在无既往心肌梗死的患者中,运动诱发的ST段压低比运动诱发的心绞痛是更优的冠状动脉疾病存在的标志物(P<0.005)。有症状的运动诱发缺血患者比仅有无症状性缺血患者严重冠状动脉疾病的患病率更高(30%比20%;95%CI,-7.3%至27.0%;P=0.005)。对于216名心肌梗死幸存者,分为相同的四组,与单独心绞痛相比,ST段压低再次是严重冠状动脉疾病存在的更优标志物(P=0.08)。无缺血加心肌梗死组、仅心绞痛加心肌梗死组、无症状性缺血加心肌梗死组和ST段压低及心绞痛加心肌梗死组严重冠状动脉疾病的患病率分别为10%、9%、23%和32%(P<0.01)。
运动诱发的ST段压低比运动诱发的心绞痛是更优的冠状动脉疾病标志物。运动试验期间的有症状缺血比无症状性缺血是严重冠状动脉疾病的更优标志物。