Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Cardiology, Amiens University South Hospital, INSERM ERI 12, Amiens, France.
Hypertension. 2010 Feb;55(2):327-32. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.142851. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
Peripheral (brachial) pulse pressure normally exceeds central (aortic) pulse pressure but is a less powerful predictor of cardiovascular risk. The difference between the 2 variables, called pulse pressure amplification, has never been specifically studied between the proximal and distal aorta in coronary patients. Our goal was to determine aortic pulse pressure amplification in subjects at high coronary risk, with emphasis on associated renal and inflammatory factors. Blood pressure was measured invasively in the ascending aorta, abdominal aorta (at the level of kidneys), and iliac artery in 101 subjects (mean age, 63+/-11 years; 61 men) undergoing coronary angiography. Independently of age, sex, and the presence of coronary stenosis, the increase of pulse pressure between the ascending and terminal aorta was over 10 mm Hg (P<0.001), whereas mean blood pressure remained unchanged. Pulse pressure amplification did not differ significantly between patients with and without coronary artery stenosis. Irrespective of confounding variables, high pulse pressure measured in the ascending aorta and at the level of renal arteries (but not in the iliac artery) was independently related to proteinuria. The increase in pulse pressure from the ascending aorta to the renal level was negatively associated with leukocyte count, even after multivariate adjustment (beta coefficient, -0.19; 95% CI, -0.39 to 0.0; P<0.05). Increased plasma creatinine and aortic pulse wave velocity were independently and positively correlated (beta coefficient, 0.36; CI, 0.18 to 0.54; P<0.001). Independently of coronary atherosclerosis, aortic pulse pressure integrates the predictive value of aortic, inflammatory, and renal factors.
外周(肱动脉)脉搏压通常超过中心(主动脉)脉搏压,但作为心血管风险的预测指标则效力较弱。这两个变量之间的差值称为脉搏压放大,在冠心病患者中,其近端和远端主动脉之间的差异从未被专门研究过。我们的目的是确定高冠心病风险患者的主动脉脉搏压放大,重点是相关的肾脏和炎症因素。在 101 名接受冠状动脉造影的患者(平均年龄 63+/-11 岁;男性 61 名)中,经皮测量升主动脉、腹主动脉(肾脏水平)和髂动脉的血压。独立于年龄、性别和冠状动脉狭窄的存在,升主动脉和终末主动脉之间的脉搏压增加超过 10mmHg(P<0.001),而平均血压保持不变。有或没有冠状动脉狭窄的患者之间的脉搏压放大没有显著差异。无论混杂因素如何,在升主动脉和肾动脉水平(而不是在髂动脉)测量的高脉冲压与蛋白尿独立相关。从升主动脉到肾水平的脉搏压增加与白细胞计数呈负相关,即使在多变量调整后也是如此(β系数,-0.19;95%CI,-0.39 至 0.0;P<0.05)。增加的血浆肌酐和主动脉脉搏波速度独立且呈正相关(β系数,0.36;CI,0.18 至 0.54;P<0.001)。独立于冠状动脉粥样硬化,主动脉脉搏压整合了主动脉、炎症和肾脏因素的预测价值。