The Univ. of Arizona, Dep. of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, 1177 E. Fourth St., Shantz Building, Room 429, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
J Environ Qual. 2009 Dec 30;39(1):402-8. doi: 10.2134/jeq2009.0307. Print 2010 Jan-Feb.
This study evaluated the influence of 20 annual land applications of Class B biosolids on the soil microbial community. The potential benefits and hazards of land application were evaluated by analysis of surface soil samples collected following the 20th land application of biosolids. The study was initiated in 1986 at the University of Arizona Marana Agricultural Center, 21 miles north of Tucson, AZ. The final application of biosolids was in March 2005, followed by growth of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) from April through November 2005. Surface soil samples (0-30 cm) were collected monthly from March 2005, 2 wk after the final biosolids application, through December 2005, and analyzed for soil microbial numbers. December samples were analyzed for additional soil microbial properties. Data show that land application of Class B biosolids had no significant long-term effect on indigenous soil microbial numbers including bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi compared to unamended control plots. Importantly, no bacterial or viral pathogens were detected in soil samples collected from biosolid amended plots in December (10 mo after the last land application) demonstrating that pathogens introduced via Class B biosolids only survived in soil transiently. However, plots that received biosolids had significantly higher microbial activity or potential for microbial transformations, including nitrification, sulfur oxidation, and dehydrogenase activity, than control plots and plots receiving inorganic fertilizers. Overall, the 20 annual land applications showed no long-term adverse effects, and therefore, this study documents that land application of biosolids at this particular site was sustainable throughout the 20-yr period, with respect to soil microbial properties.
本研究评估了 20 年每年土地应用 B 级生物固体对土壤微生物群落的影响。通过分析第 20 次生物固体土地应用后采集的表层土壤样本,评估了土地应用的潜在益处和危害。该研究于 1986 年在亚利桑那大学马里纳农业中心开始,位于亚利桑那州图森市以北 21 英里处。最后一次生物固体的应用是在 2005 年 3 月,随后在 2005 年 4 月至 11 月种植棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L.)。从 2005 年 3 月最后一次生物固体应用后的第 2 周开始,每月从表层土壤(0-30 厘米)采集样本,直至 2005 年 12 月,并分析土壤微生物数量。12 月的样本用于分析其他土壤微生物特性。数据表明,与未施肥对照相比,B 级生物固体的土地应用对包括细菌、放线菌和真菌在内的本地土壤微生物数量没有显著的长期影响。重要的是,在 12 月(最后一次土地应用 10 个月后)从生物固体改良的土壤样本中未检测到细菌或病毒病原体,这表明通过 B 级生物固体引入的病原体仅在土壤中短暂存活。然而,接受生物固体的土壤具有明显更高的微生物活性或微生物转化的潜力,包括硝化、硫氧化和脱氢酶活性,比对照和接受无机肥料的土壤更高。总体而言,这 20 年的土地应用没有显示出长期的不利影响,因此,本研究证明,在这个特定地点,生物固体的土地应用在 20 年期间是可持续的,就土壤微生物特性而言。