Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (IPGMER), Kolkata, India.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;44(3):237-42. doi: 10.3109/00048670903487134.
Atypical antipsychotics are increasingly drugs of first choice in schizophrenia. Amisulpride, a new atypical antipsychotic, is reported to be effective for both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia in Western countries but Indian experience is limited. The aim of the present study was therefore to conduct a trial of amisulpride versus olanzapine in Indian schizophrenia patients.
Eighty adult patients of either sex were randomized to receive standard doses of the two drugs orally, in a single blind manner, for 12 weeks, with follow up at 4 and 8 weeks. Effectiveness was assessed by changes in scores on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS), Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), and physician-administered Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. Tolerability was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
Evaluable were 39 patients on amisulpride and 38 on olanzapine. The groups were comparable at baseline with respect to demographics, illness duration and rating scores. Final BPRS score was lower for olanzapine (33.2 +/- 9.44) than for amisulpride (37.7 +/- 9.67). SAPS and SANS scores and CGI rating improved individually in both arms but remained comparable between groups throughout the study period, but olanzapine reduced SAPS score to a greater extent. ADRs were encountered in 67.5% and 47.5% of patients (p = 0.113) on amisulpride and olanzapine, respectively. Tremor and insomnia were more frequent with amisulpride, while olanzapine caused more weight gain and sedation. No serious ADRs occurred.
Amisulpride, although comparable to olanzapine on some measures, did not match the improvement seen with the latter drug in BPRS and SAPS scores. Despite differences in ADR profiles, overall tolerability was satisfactory for both drugs. In Indian patients, amisulpride should therefore be an alternative to olanzapine to a limited extent, such as when weight gain and sedation are undesirable.
非典型抗精神病药在精神分裂症中的应用日益增多,已成为首选药物。在西方国家,新型非典型抗精神病药氨磺必利对精神分裂症的阳性和阴性症状均有疗效,但印度的经验有限。因此,本研究旨在对氨磺必利与奥氮平治疗印度精神分裂症患者的疗效进行比较。
80 例成年患者按性别随机分为两组,分别给予标准剂量的氨磺必利或奥氮平,单盲法口服,疗程 12 周,4 周和 8 周时进行随访。采用简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)、阳性症状评定量表(SAPS)、阴性症状评定量表(SANS)和医生总体印象量表(CGI)评估疗效,以评分变化衡量。采用治疗中出现的不良反应(ADRs)评估药物耐受性。
39 例患者完成了氨磺必利治疗,38 例完成了奥氮平治疗。两组基线资料、病程和评分具有可比性。奥氮平治疗结束时 BPRS 评分(33.2±9.44)低于氨磺必利(37.7±9.67)。SAPS 和 SANS 评分及 CGI 评分均有改善,但组间差异无统计学意义,奥氮平对 SAPS 评分的改善更显著。氨磺必利组和奥氮平组分别有 67.5%和 47.5%的患者出现 ADR(p=0.113)。氨磺必利组更常见震颤和失眠,奥氮平组更常见体重增加和镇静。未发生严重 ADR。
氨磺必利在某些方面与奥氮平相当,但对 BPRS 和 SAPS 评分的改善不如后者。尽管不良反应谱不同,但两药的总体耐受性均满意。在印度患者中,氨磺必利应在一定程度上替代奥氮平,如出现体重增加和镇静等不良反应时。