Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, IL 61820, USA.
Brain Res. 2010 Mar 4;1317:180-91. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.074. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
Event-related potential (ERP) studies of recognition memory have shown dissociations between item recognition and source memory, wherein item recognition is associated with the mid-frontal FN400 component, which varies continuously with item memory strength, while source memory is associated with the late parietal effect (LPC). There is current debate about whether source memory can vary along a continuum of memory strength or is a threshold process. The LPC has been shown to be generally sensitive to correct versus incorrect source judgments, but varying levels of "source strength" along a single dimension of source evidence have not been tested. The current experiment had participants encode novel visual objects in one of two different task contexts by performing either a conceptual or perceptual judgment about the object. On a subsequent memory test, participants made an old/new decision on a 4-point confidence scale followed by a source memory confidence judgment, in which they indicated their confidence about which task they had performed with the object at encoding. ERPs from the memory test were examined for electrophysiological correlates of both item and source memory strength. Item memory was associated with differences in the 300-500 ms time window, consistent with the timing of the FN400. Differences in the amplitude of the LPC were observed between correct and incorrect source decisions, consistent with previous findings. Comparing low and high confidence source decisions also revealed differences, suggesting that the LPC is also sensitive to variations in the strength of source memory.
事件相关电位(ERP)研究表明,再认记忆中存在项目记忆和来源记忆的分离,其中项目记忆与额中 FN400 成分相关,该成分随项目记忆强度连续变化,而来源记忆与后顶叶效应(LPC)相关。目前存在关于来源记忆是否可以沿着记忆强度的连续体变化,或者是一个阈值过程的争论。已经表明 LPC 通常对正确与错误的来源判断敏感,但尚未测试单一来源证据维度上的“来源强度”的不同水平。在当前的实验中,参与者通过对物体执行概念或感知判断,在两种不同的任务情境中对新的视觉物体进行编码。在随后的记忆测试中,参与者在 4 点置信度量表上对旧/新做出决定,然后对来源记忆置信度做出判断,他们表明对在编码时对物体执行的任务的置信度。对记忆测试的 ERP 进行了检查,以寻找项目和来源记忆强度的电生理相关性。项目记忆与 300-500 毫秒时间窗口中的差异相关,与 FN400 的时间一致。在正确和错误来源决策之间观察到 LPC 幅度的差异,与先前的发现一致。比较低和高置信度来源决策也揭示了差异,表明 LPC 也对来源记忆强度的变化敏感。