• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近期接种疫苗的发热婴幼儿中严重细菌性感染。

Serious bacterial infection in recently immunized young febrile infants.

机构信息

From the Department of Medicine (MW, RB) and the Division of Emergency Medicine (RB), Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Dec;16(12):1284-1289. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00582.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00582.x
PMID:20053249
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of serious bacterial infection (SBI) in febrile infants without a source aged 6-12 weeks who have received immunizations in the preceding 72 hours.

METHODS

The authors conducted a medical record review of infants aged 6-12 weeks with a fever of > or = 38.0 degrees C presenting to the pediatric emergency department (ED) over 88 months. Infants were classified either as having received immunizations within the 72 hours preceding the ED visit (recent immunization [RI]) or as not having received immunizations during this time period (no recent immunization [NRI]). Primary outcome of an SBI was based on culture results; only patients with a minimum of blood and urine cultures were studied.

RESULTS

A total of 1,978 febrile infants were studied, of whom 213 (10.8%) had received RIs. The overall prevalence of definite SBI was 6.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.5 to 7.7). The prevalence of definite SBI in NRI infants was 7.0% (95% CI = 5.9 to 8.3) compared to 2.8% (95% CI = 0.6 to 5.1) in the RI infants. The prevalence of definite SBI in febrile infants vaccinated in the preceding 24 hours decreased to 0.6% (95% CI = 0 to 1.9). The prevalence of definite SBI in febrile infants vaccinated greater than 24 hours prior to presentation was 8.9% (95 CI = 1.5 to 16.4). The relative risk of SBI with RI was 0.41 (95% CI = 0.19 to 0.90). All SBIs in the RI infants were urinary tract infections (UTI).

CONCLUSIONS

Among febrile infants, the prevalence of SBI is less in the initial 24 hours following immunizations. However, there is still a substantial risk of UTI. Therefore, urine testing should be considered in febrile infants who present within 24 hours of immunization. Infants who present greater than 24 hours after immunizations with fever should be managed similarly to infants without RIs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查在接受免疫接种后 72 小时内出现发热(>或=38.0°C)且无感染源的 6-12 周龄婴儿中严重细菌感染(SBI)的发生率。

方法

作者对 88 个月期间因发热(>38.0°C)而就诊于儿科急诊(ED)的 6-12 周龄婴儿进行了病历回顾。婴儿分为免疫接种在 ED 就诊前 72 小时内(近期免疫接种[RI])或在此期间未接受免疫接种(无近期免疫接种[NRI])。SBI 的主要结局基于培养结果;仅对接受至少血液和尿液培养的患者进行了研究。

结果

共研究了 1978 例发热婴儿,其中 213 例(10.8%)接受了 RI。明确 SBI 的总体发生率为 6.6%(95%置信区间[CI]为 5.5 至 7.7)。NRI 婴儿中明确 SBI 的发生率为 7.0%(95%CI 为 5.9 至 8.3),而 RI 婴儿中明确 SBI 的发生率为 2.8%(95%CI 为 0.6 至 5.1)。在接种疫苗后 24 小时内发热的婴儿中,明确 SBI 的发生率降至 0.6%(95%CI 为 0 至 1.9)。在就诊前大于 24 小时接种疫苗的发热婴儿中,明确 SBI 的发生率为 8.9%(95%CI 为 1.5 至 16.4)。RI 婴儿的 SBI 相对风险为 0.41(95%CI 为 0.19 至 0.90)。所有 RI 婴儿的 SBI 均为尿路感染(UTI)。

结论

在发热婴儿中,接种疫苗后最初 24 小时内 SBI 的发生率较低。然而,仍存在 UTI 的较大风险。因此,在接种疫苗后 24 小时内就诊的发热婴儿中,应考虑进行尿液检测。在接种疫苗后大于 24 小时发热的婴儿,应与无 RI 的婴儿类似地进行处理。

相似文献

1
Serious bacterial infection in recently immunized young febrile infants.近期接种疫苗的发热婴幼儿中严重细菌性感染。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Dec;16(12):1284-1289. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00582.x.
2
Serious bacterial infection risk in recently immunized febrile infants in the emergency department.急诊近期免疫接种发热婴儿发生严重细菌感染的风险。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;80:138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.03.025. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
3
Risk of serious bacterial infection in young febrile infants with respiratory syncytial virus infections.呼吸道合胞病毒感染的发热婴幼儿发生严重细菌感染的风险。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):1728-34. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1728.
4
Serious bacterial infections in febrile infants in the post-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine era.肺炎球菌结合疫苗时代发热婴儿的严重细菌感染
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;16(7):585-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00444.x. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
5
Prevalence of serious bacterial infections in febrile infants with respiratory syncytial virus infection.呼吸道合胞病毒感染的发热婴儿中严重细菌感染的患病率。
Pediatrics. 2003 Aug;112(2):282-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.2.282.
6
Influenza virus infection and the risk of serious bacterial infections in young febrile infants.流感病毒感染与发热婴幼儿严重细菌感染的风险
Pediatrics. 2009 Jul;124(1):30-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2915.
7
Epidemiology of serious bacterial infection in febrile infants under 3 months of age and diagnostic management in Mayotte.发热 3 个月以下婴儿严重细菌感染的流行病学和马约特岛的诊断管理。
Arch Pediatr. 2021 Oct;28(7):553-558. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
8
Definite bacterial infection in recently vaccinated febrile infants.近期接种疫苗的发热婴儿确诊细菌感染。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Jun;56(6):889-892. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14770. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
9
Enhanced urinalysis improves identification of febrile infants ages 60 days and younger at low risk for serious bacterial illness.强化尿液分析有助于识别60日龄及以下、患严重细菌性疾病风险较低的发热婴儿。
Pediatrics. 2001 Oct;108(4):866-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.4.866.
10
Prevalence of Bacterial Infection in Febrile Infant 61-90 Days Old Compared With Younger Infants.61-90 天龄发热婴儿与年龄较小婴儿的细菌感染发生率比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019 Dec;38(12):1163-1167. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002461.

引用本文的文献

1
The Prevalence of Invasive Bacterial Infection in Febrile Infants Presenting to Hospital Following Meningococcal B Immunisation: A Case Series.B 型脑膜炎球菌疫苗接种后因发热入院的婴儿侵袭性细菌感染患病率:病例系列研究
Pediatr Rep. 2025 Feb 8;17(1):20. doi: 10.3390/pediatric17010020.
2
La prise en charge des nourrissons de 90 jours ou moins, fiévreux mais dans un bon état général.对90天及以下、发烧但一般状况良好的婴儿的护理。
Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Feb 6;29(1):50-66. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxad084. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Management of well-appearing febrile young infants aged ≤90 days.
90日龄及以下外观良好的发热婴幼儿的管理
Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Feb 6;29(1):50-66. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxad085. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Conundrums in the Management of Febrile Infants under Three Months of Age and Future Research.三个月以下发热婴儿的管理难题与未来研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jan 16;13(1):88. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010088.
5
Post-immunization leucocytosis and its implications for the management of febrile infants.接种后白细胞增多及其对发热婴儿管理的意义。
Vaccine. 2018 May 11;36(20):2870-2875. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
6
Febrile Child.发热儿童。
Indian J Pediatr. 2017 Oct;84(10):782-786. doi: 10.1007/s12098-017-2425-y. Epub 2017 Aug 23.