Koenderink Jan J, Albertazzi Liliana, van Doorn Andrea J, van Ee Raymond, van de Grind Wim A, Kappers Astrid M L, Lappin Joe S, Norman J Farley, Stijn Oomes A H J, te Pas Susan P, Phillips Flip, Pont Sylvia C, Richards Whitman A, Todd James T, Verstraten Frans A J, de Vries Sjoerd
Delft University of Technology, Faculty of EEMCS, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 May;134(1):40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
The issue of the existence of planes-understood as the carriers of a nexus of straight lines-in the monocular visual space of a stationary human observer has never been addressed. The most recent empirical data apply to binocular visual space and date from the 1960s (Foley, 1964). This appears to be both the first and the last time this basic issue was addressed empirically. Yet the question is of considerable conceptual interest. Here we report on a direct empirical test of the existence of planes in monocular visual space for a group of sixteen experienced observers. For the majority of these observers monocular visual space lacks a projective structure, albeit in qualitatively different ways. This greatly reduces the set of viable geometrical models. For example, it rules out all the classical homogeneous spaces (the Cayley-Klein geometries) such as the familiar Luneburg model. The qualitatively different behavior of experienced observers implies that the generic population might well be inhomogeneous with respect to the structure of visual space.
在静止人类观察者的单眼视觉空间中,平面(被理解为直线关系的载体)的存在问题从未得到解决。最新的实证数据适用于双眼视觉空间,且可追溯到20世纪60年代(福利,1964年)。这似乎是这个基本问题首次也是最后一次通过实证研究来探讨。然而,这个问题在概念上相当有趣。在此,我们报告了针对一组16名经验丰富的观察者对单眼视觉空间中平面存在性的直接实证测试。对于这些观察者中的大多数来说,单眼视觉空间缺乏射影结构,尽管方式在质上有所不同。这极大地减少了可行几何模型的集合。例如,它排除了所有经典的齐次空间(凯莱 - 克莱因几何),如常见的吕内堡模型。经验丰富的观察者在质上不同的行为意味着,就视觉空间结构而言,普通人群很可能是不均匀的。