Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK.
Vet J. 2011 Feb;187(2):207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.12.005. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
Several surveillance techniques have been used to quantify the prevalence of both classical and atypical scrapie in British sheep, namely the recording of clinical suspects (RC) and the testing of animals slaughtered at abattoir (AS) or reported as fallen stock (FS). Any estimate of prevalence based on a particular source is likely to have been affected by demographic differences in the populations sampled. In this study, the demographic characteristics of scrapie-affected holdings detected by each of the surveillance streams (RC, AS, FS) in Great Britain were compared. Analyses of all three streams indicated that the probability of an affected holding being detected by a particular stream differed by geographical area, the number of animals brought onto the holding, the type of scrapie identified (classical vs. atypical) and the year. More detailed analysis of AS and FS suggested that the annual and regional differences between these surveys could be explained by differences in sampling effort.
已经使用了几种监测技术来量化英国绵羊中经典和非典型羊瘙痒病的流行情况,即记录临床疑似病例(RC)和屠宰场(AS)屠宰的动物检测或作为病畜报告(FS)。任何基于特定来源的流行率估计都可能受到抽样人群在人口统计学上的差异的影响。在这项研究中,比较了通过每种监测流(RC、AS、FS)在英国检测到的受瘙痒病影响的养殖场的人口统计学特征。对所有三种流的分析表明,特定流检测到受影响养殖场的概率因地理区域、带入养殖场的动物数量、鉴定的瘙痒病类型(经典型与非典型型)和年份而异。对 AS 和 FS 的更详细分析表明,这些调查之间的年度和区域差异可以通过抽样力度的差异来解释。