• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项 AMG 317(一种 IL-4Ralpha 拮抗剂)治疗哮喘患者的随机、对照、2 期研究。

A randomized, controlled, phase 2 study of AMG 317, an IL-4Ralpha antagonist, in patients with asthma.

机构信息

Allergy Research Foundation, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr 15;181(8):788-96. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200909-1448OC. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1164/rccm.200909-1448OC
PMID:20056900
Abstract

RATIONALE

IL-4 and IL-13 share many biological functions important in the development of allergic airway inflammation and are implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma. AMG 317 is a fully human monoclonal antibody to IL-4Ralpha that blocks both IL-4 and IL-13 pathways.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate efficacy and safety of AMG 317 in patients with moderate to severe asthma.

METHODS

In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients received weekly subcutaneous injections of placebo or AMG 317 (75-300 mg) for 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week follow-up period. The primary endpoint was change from baseline at Week 12 in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) symptom score.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Mean ACQ change (SE) was -0.49 (0.09) in placebo (n = 74), and -0.43 (0.11), -0.58 (0.12), and -0.70 (0.09) in the AMG 317 75 mg (n = 73), 150 mg (n = 73), and 300 mg (n = 74) groups, respectively (treatment effect P = 0.25). No statistically significant differences were observed in the secondary endpoints. Numerical decreases in number of and time to exacerbations were noted in patients receiving AMG 317 150 mg and 300 mg. Preplanned analyses by tertile of baseline ACQ revealed that patients with higher baseline ACQ scores (>or=2.86) were more likely to respond to AMG 317. Serious adverse events were reported in three patients, each noted as not related to study drug.

CONCLUSIONS

AMG 317 did not demonstrate clinical efficacy across the overall group of patients. Clinically significant improvements were observed in several outcome measures in patients with higher baseline ACQ scores. AMG 317 was safe and well tolerated in this study population. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00436670).

摘要

理由

IL-4 和 IL-13 具有许多在过敏性气道炎症发展中重要的生物学功能,并且与哮喘的发病机制有关。AMG 317 是一种针对 IL-4Ralpha 的完全人源单克隆抗体,可阻断 IL-4 和 IL-13 途径。

目的

评估 AMG 317 在中重度哮喘患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项 2 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,患者每周接受一次皮下注射安慰剂或 AMG 317(75-300mg),共 12 周,随后进行 4 周随访期。主要终点是从基线到第 12 周时哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)症状评分的变化。

测量和主要结果

安慰剂组(n=74)的平均 ACQ 变化(SE)为-0.49(0.09),AMG 317 75mg 组(n=73)、150mg 组(n=73)和 300mg 组(n=74)分别为-0.43(0.11)、-0.58(0.12)和-0.70(0.09)(治疗效果 P=0.25)。次要终点未观察到统计学上的显著差异。接受 AMG 317 150mg 和 300mg 治疗的患者的恶化次数和时间均有数值减少。根据基线 ACQ 的三分位数进行的预先计划分析显示,基线 ACQ 评分较高(≥2.86)的患者更有可能对 AMG 317 有反应。有 3 名患者报告了严重不良事件,均被认为与研究药物无关。

结论

AMG 317 在整个患者组中未显示出临床疗效。在基线 ACQ 较高的患者中,几个结局指标有明显的改善。在该研究人群中,AMG 317 安全且耐受良好。该临床试验已在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册(NCT 00436670)。

相似文献

1
A randomized, controlled, phase 2 study of AMG 317, an IL-4Ralpha antagonist, in patients with asthma.一项 AMG 317(一种 IL-4Ralpha 拮抗剂)治疗哮喘患者的随机、对照、2 期研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr 15;181(8):788-96. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200909-1448OC. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
2
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of brodalumab, a human anti-IL-17 receptor monoclonal antibody, in moderate to severe asthma.随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究布罗达umab(一种人抗 IL-17 受体单克隆抗体)在中重度哮喘中的应用。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Dec 1;188(11):1294-302. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201212-2318OC.
3
Safety and efficacy of the prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonist AMG 853 in asthmatic patients.前列腺素 D2 受体拮抗剂 AMG 853 在哮喘患者中的安全性和疗效。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Feb;131(2):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.10.013. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
4
Efficacy and safety of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (Adderall XR) in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adolescent patients: a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.混合安非他明盐缓释剂(阿得拉XR)治疗青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的疗效与安全性:一项为期4周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2006 Feb;28(2):266-79. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.02.011.
5
Brodalumab, an anti-interleukin-17-receptor antibody for psoriasis.布罗达单抗,一种用于治疗银屑病的抗白细胞介素-17 受体抗体。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 29;366(13):1181-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109017.
6
Liberty Asthma QUEST: Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate Dupilumab Efficacy/Safety in Patients with Uncontrolled, Moderate-to-Severe Asthma.利博泰哮喘 QUEST:评价度普利尤单抗在未控制的中重度哮喘患者中的疗效/安全性的 3 期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组研究。
Adv Ther. 2018 May;35(5):737-748. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0702-4. Epub 2018 May 3.
7
Daclizumab improves asthma control in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma: a randomized, controlled trial.达利珠单抗可改善中度至重度持续性哮喘患者的哮喘控制:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Nov 15;178(10):1002-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200708-1200OC. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
8
Therapeutic benefit of blocking interleukin-6 activity with an anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial.抗白细胞介素-6受体单克隆抗体阻断白细胞介素-6活性在类风湿关节炎中的治疗益处:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、剂量递增试验。
Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Dec;46(12):3143-50. doi: 10.1002/art.10623.
9
A randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effect of an anti-interleukin-9 monoclonal antibody in adults with uncontrolled asthma.一项评估抗白细胞介素-9 单克隆抗体在未控制的哮喘成人中的疗效的随机、对照试验。
Respir Res. 2013 Sep 19;14(1):93. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-93.
10
Heart rate-lowering efficacy and respiratory safety of ivabradine in patients with obstructive airway disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.在伴有气道阻塞性疾病的患者中,伊伐布雷定的降心率疗效和呼吸安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2012 Jun 1;12(3):179-88. doi: 10.2165/11597400-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
A current review on animal models of anti-asthmatic drugs screening.抗哮喘药物筛选动物模型的当前综述。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 28;16:1508460. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1508460. eCollection 2025.
2
The Relationship Between Zonulin and Asthma: A Mouse Model Study.闭合蛋白与哮喘的关系:一项小鼠模型研究。
J Rhinol. 2023 Nov;30(3):161-166. doi: 10.18787/jr.2023.00062. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
3
New insights into the pathophysiology and therapeutic targets of asthma and comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis.
哮喘和伴或不伴鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的病理生理学和治疗靶点的新见解。
Clin Sci (Lond). 2023 May 18;137(9):727-753. doi: 10.1042/CS20190281.
4
The clinical efficacy of type 2 monoclonal antibodies in eosinophil-associated chronic airway diseases: a meta-analysis.2 型单克隆抗体在嗜酸性粒细胞相关慢性气道疾病中的临床疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2023 Apr 11;14:1089710. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1089710. eCollection 2023.
5
Immunologic Basis of Type 2 Biologics for Severe Asthma.重度哮喘2型生物制剂的免疫学基础
Immune Netw. 2022 Dec 5;22(6):e45. doi: 10.4110/in.2022.22.e45. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Anti-IL-5 therapies for asthma.哮喘的抗 IL-5 治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 12;7(7):CD010834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010834.pub4.
7
IL-4/IL-13 axis as therapeutic targets in allergic rhinitis and asthma.IL-4/IL-13 轴作为变应性鼻炎和哮喘的治疗靶点。
PeerJ. 2022 May 30;10:e13444. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13444. eCollection 2022.
8
Biologics in Asthma: A Molecular Perspective to Precision Medicine.哮喘中的生物制剂:精准医学的分子视角
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 19;12:793409. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.793409. eCollection 2021.
9
Anti-interleukin-13 and anti-interleukin-4 agents versus placebo, anti-interleukin-5 or anti-immunoglobulin-E agents, for people with asthma.抗白细胞介素-13 和抗白细胞介素-4 药物与安慰剂、抗白细胞介素-5 或抗免疫球蛋白 E 药物治疗哮喘患者的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 19;10(10):CD012929. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012929.pub2.
10
Early responders within seven days of dupilumab treatment for severe asthma evaluated by patient-reported outcome: a pilot study.通过患者报告结局评估的度普利尤单抗治疗重度哮喘7天内的早期应答者:一项试点研究。
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2021 Mar 17;16(1):736. doi: 10.4081/mrm.2021.736. eCollection 2021 Jan 15.