Suppr超能文献

左心室射血分数以及未使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂可预测一级预防人群中恰当的除颤器治疗。

Left ventricular ejection fraction and absence of ACE inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker predicts appropriate defibrillator therapy in the primary prevention population.

作者信息

Obeyesekere Manoj N, Chan William, Stub Dion, Prabhu S, Teo Eliza P, Toogood Geoff, Mariani Justin, Broughton Archer, Kistler Peter M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Baker IDI Research Institute, Prahran, Australia.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 Jun 1;33(6):696-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02669.x. Epub 2010 Jan 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) significantly reduce mortality in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. However, little is known of the predictors of appropriate device activation in the primary prevention population. The aim of the present study was to determine predictors of appropriate device therapy in patients receiving ICDs for primary prevention.

METHODS & RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of < 35% and no prior documented ventricular arrhythmias underwent ICD implantation. The ICD implanted was single chamber in 60 (48%), dual chamber in 10 (8%), and biventricular in 56 (44%) patients and programmed with a single ventricular fibrillation (VF) zone at >180 beats per minute. Mean age was 58 +/- 13 years and mean LVEF was 23 +/- 7%. Fifty-two percent had ischemic cardiomyopathy and 66% were New York Heart Association heart failure class II/III. During a mean follow-up period of 589 +/- 353 days, 17 (13%) patients received appropriate device therapy and three (4%) received inappropriate shocks. Appropriate ICD therapy was associated with reduced LVEF (mean 19.9% vs 23.7%, P = 0.02) and the patients were less likely to have received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (AIIRB) (65% vs 90%, P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed lack of ACEI/AIIRB (odds ratio [OR]= 0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]= 0.01-0.37, P = <0.01) and lower LVEF (OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.98, P = 0.02) predicted appropriate device activation. There was no difference in transplant-free survival between the appropriate therapy and no/inappropriate therapy groups, LVEF <20% and LVEF >20% group, and lack of ACEI/AIIRB and ACEI/AIIRB group.

CONCLUSION

Appropriate device activation occurred in 13% of patients in a primary prevention population. LVEF and absence of ACEI/AIIRB predicted appropriate ICD therapy.

摘要

引言

植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)可显著降低左心室(LV)功能障碍患者的死亡率。然而,对于一级预防人群中合适的设备激活预测因素知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定接受ICD进行一级预防的患者中合适的设备治疗预测因素。

方法与结果

126例左心室射血分数(LVEF)<35%且既往无记录的室性心律失常患者接受了ICD植入。植入的ICD中,60例(48%)为单腔,10例(8%)为双腔,56例(44%)为双心室,且设置了一个心室颤动(VF)区,心率>180次/分钟。平均年龄为58±13岁,平均LVEF为23±7%。52%的患者患有缺血性心肌病,66%为纽约心脏协会心力衰竭II/III级。在平均随访期589±353天内,17例(13%)患者接受了合适的设备治疗,3例(4%)接受了不适当的电击。合适的ICD治疗与较低的LVEF相关(平均19.9%对23.7%,P = 0.02),且患者接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(AIIRB)的可能性较小(65%对90%,P = 0.04)。多因素分析显示,未使用ACEI/AIIRB(比值比[OR]=0.06,95%置信区间[CI]=0.01 - 0.37,P = <0.01)和较低的LVEF(OR = 0.88,95% CI 0.79 - 0.98,P = 0.02)可预测合适设备激活。合适治疗组与无/不适当治疗组、LVEF<20%组与LVEF>20%组、未使用ACEI/AIIRB组与使用ACEI/AIIRB组之间的无移植生存率无差异。

结论

在一级预防人群中,13%的患者出现了合适的设备激活。LVEF和未使用ACEI/AIIRB可预测合适的ICD治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验