Suppr超能文献

用于评估蛋白质致敏潜力的引流淋巴结测定法(DLNA)。

A draining lymph node assay (DLNA) for assessing the sensitizing potential of proteins.

机构信息

Toxicology & Environmental Research and Consulting, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI 48674, USA.

出版信息

Toxicol Lett. 2010 Mar 15;193(2):144-51. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.12.020. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

Abstract

There is a need for a simple and predictive model to identify the respiratory sensitization potential of (novel) proteins. The present study examined the use of a mouse draining lymph node assay (DLNA) approach, employing several routes of exposure, as a possible starting point for assessing protein sensitization potential. Consistent with the experimental procedure for the standard local lymph node assay (LLNA), female BALB/c mice were dosed dermally (topical), intranasally (IN) or by oropharyngeal aspiration (OP) on days 1, 2 and 3, and proliferation in the relevant draining lymph nodes was measured on day 6. For each route, the auricular, superficial cervical and tracheobronchial lymph nodes (TBLN) were evaluated following treatment with Subtilisin Carlsberg (SUB; a potent sensitizer/allergen), ovalbumin (OVA; a potent food allergen), beta-lactoglobulin (BLG; a moderate food allergen), and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH; a strong immunogen with no reports of respiratory sensitization). Initial studies with OVA indicated that dermal administration did not stimulate lymph node proliferation. Responses in the tracheobronchial lymph node were most dramatic (stimulation indices up to 100) and reproducible for both the IN and OP routes. In a comparative experiment, all proteins induced lymph node proliferation with a rank order potency of SUB>KLH>OVA>BLG. The influence of the endotoxin content on lymph node proliferation was determined to be minimal, and did not impact the rank order potency. Molecular characterization of the TBLN at an equipotent proliferative dose was conducted for select gene transcripts based on research examining chemical sensitizers. Expression profiles differed among the four proteins, but the relevance of these responses was not clear and they did not further discriminate their allergic potential. These data illustrate both the opportunities and challenges associated with the examination of the draining lymph node proliferative response to assess the allergenic potential of proteins.

摘要

需要有一种简单且可预测的模型来识别(新型)蛋白质的呼吸致敏潜力。本研究探讨了使用小鼠引流淋巴结测定(DLNA)方法,通过几种暴露途径,作为评估蛋白质致敏潜力的起点。与标准局部淋巴结测定(LLNA)的实验程序一致,雌性 BALB/c 小鼠在第 1、2 和 3 天经皮(局部)、经鼻(IN)或经口咽吸入(OP)给药,在第 6 天测量相关引流淋巴结的增殖情况。对于每种途径,在使用枯草杆菌蛋白酶(SUB;一种有效的致敏剂/过敏原)、卵清蛋白(OVA;一种有效的食物过敏原)、β-乳球蛋白(BLG;一种中等食物过敏原)和血蓝蛋白(KLH;一种没有呼吸致敏报告的强免疫原)处理后,评估耳、颈浅和气管支气管淋巴结(TBLN)。用 OVA 进行的初步研究表明,局部给药不会刺激淋巴结增殖。气管支气管淋巴结的反应最为明显(刺激指数高达 100),IN 和 OP 两种途径的反应都具有可重复性。在一项比较实验中,所有蛋白质都诱导淋巴结增殖,其效力等级为 SUB>KLH>OVA>BLG。研究表明,内毒素含量对淋巴结增殖的影响最小,不会影响效力等级。根据研究化学致敏剂的研究,基于选择基因转录物,在等效增殖剂量下对 TBLN 进行了分子特征分析。四种蛋白质的表达谱不同,但这些反应的相关性尚不清楚,也不能进一步区分它们的过敏潜力。这些数据说明了检查引流淋巴结增殖反应以评估蛋白质的变应原潜力所涉及的机遇和挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验