Blumenfeld Thomas J, Scott Richard D
Knee. 2010 Dec;17(6):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.11.008. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
Use of an all-polyethylene tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty remains an attractive option considering the reported durability of the construct, the lowered cost compared to modular metal-backed tibia, and the elimination of backside wear. The two major intra-operative disadvantages include the inability to alter the tibial component thickness after permanent implant placement and the inability to use varus-valgus constrained designs. The long-term disadvantage is the inability to perform a modular insert exchange should this be required. We report the 30-year outcome of a single patient using the duopatellar total knee replacement system. Based on a critical review of the literature we would recommend use in patients 80 years of age or older, consideration in patients 75 to 79 years, and possibly in younger yet less active patients. These three groups would be the least likely to require a modular tibial liner exchange in their lifetime.
考虑到报道的假体耐用性、与模块化金属背衬胫骨相比成本降低以及消除了背面磨损,在初次全膝关节置换术中使用全聚乙烯胫骨部件仍然是一个有吸引力的选择。术中的两个主要缺点包括永久植入后无法改变胫骨部件的厚度以及无法使用内翻-外翻受限设计。长期缺点是如果需要无法进行模块化插入物更换。我们报告了一名使用双髌全膝关节置换系统患者的30年随访结果。基于对文献的批判性回顾,我们建议在80岁及以上患者中使用,75至79岁患者可考虑使用,对于年龄较小但活动较少的患者也可考虑使用。这三组患者一生中最不可能需要更换模块化胫骨衬垫。