Walde T A, Bussert J, Sehmisch S, Balcarek P, Stürmer K M, Walde H J, Frosch K H
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medicine, 37099 Göttingen, Germany.
Knee. 2010 Dec;17(6):381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.12.001. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
Femoral malrotation in total knee arthroplasty is correlated to an increased number of revisions. Anatomic landmarks such as Whiteside line, posterior condyle axis and transepicondylar axis are used for determining femoral component rotation. The femoral rotation achieved with the anatomical landmarks is compared to the femoral rotation achieved by a navigated ligament tension-based tibia-first technique. Ninety-three consecutive patients with gonarthritis were prospectively enrolled. Intraoperatively the anatomical landmarks for femoral rotation and the achieved femoral rotation using a navigated tension-based tibia-first technique were determined and stored for further comparison. A pre- and postoperative functional diagram displaying the extension and flexion and varus or valgus positions was also part of the evaluation. Using anatomical landmarks the rotational errors ranged from 12.2° of internal rotation to 15.5° of external rotation from parallel to the tibial resection surface at 90° flexion. A statistical significant improved femoral rotation was achieved using the ligament tension-based method with a rotational error ranged from 3.0° of internal rotation to 2.4° of external rotation. The functional analyses demonstrated statistical significant lower varus/valgus deviations within the flexion range and an improved maximum varus deviation at 90° flexion using the ligament tension-based method. Compared to the anatomical landmarks a balanced, almost parallel flexion gap was achieved using a navigation technique taking the ligament tension of the knee joint into account. As a result the improved femoral rotation was demonstrated by the functional evaluation. Unilateral overloading of the polyethylene inlay and unilateral instability can thus be avoided.
全膝关节置换术中股骨旋转不良与翻修手术数量增加相关。诸如Whiteside线、后髁轴和经髁间轴等解剖标志用于确定股骨假体的旋转。将使用解剖标志实现的股骨旋转与通过基于导航韧带张力的胫骨优先技术实现的股骨旋转进行比较。前瞻性纳入93例连续的膝关节炎患者。术中确定并存储股骨旋转的解剖标志以及使用基于导航张力的胫骨优先技术实现的股骨旋转,以便进一步比较。术前和术后显示伸展、屈曲以及内翻或外翻位置的功能图表也是评估的一部分。使用解剖标志时,在90°屈曲时相对于胫骨截骨面平行的旋转误差范围为内旋12.2°至外旋15.5°。使用基于韧带张力的方法实现了统计学上显著改善的股骨旋转,旋转误差范围为内旋3.0°至外旋2.4°。功能分析表明,使用基于韧带张力的方法在屈曲范围内内翻/外翻偏差在统计学上显著降低,并且在90°屈曲时最大内翻偏差得到改善。与解剖标志相比,使用考虑膝关节韧带张力的导航技术实现了平衡的、几乎平行的屈曲间隙。结果,功能评估证明了股骨旋转得到改善。因此可以避免聚乙烯衬垫的单侧过载和单侧不稳定。