Benz Andreas, Zenker Wolfgang, Hildebrandt Thomas B, Weissengruber Gerald, Eulenberger Klaus, Geyer Hans
Institute of Veterinary-Anatomy, Vetsuisse Faculty of the University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2009 Dec;40(4):711-25. doi: 10.1638/2006-0059.1.
As a result of the lack of basic microscopic anatomy of the elephants' foot, this study deals with the normal microscopic morphology of both the Asian (Elephas maximus) and African (Loxodonta africana) elephant foot with consideration of pathologic changes. A total of 727 histologic samples from defined locations of 24 hooves of both species (17 Asian and seven African species) were studied, measured, and evaluated. Minor differences between the feet and species are seen histologically. Poor horn quality in captive elephants' hooves and loci of minor resistance in captive and wild animals are detected. The thickness of the weight-bearing surface of the captive elephants' hooves is histologically measured as "very thin" (about 10 mm). The normal histologic findings provide a basis for assessing histopathologic changes and especially horn quality. The histologic findings might explain some of the foot problems, but they also give rise to questions about the quality and correctness of current husbandry techniques.
由于缺乏大象足部的基本微观解剖学研究,本研究探讨了亚洲象(印度象)和非洲象(非洲草原象)足部的正常微观形态,并考虑了病理变化。对两种象(17头亚洲象和7头非洲象)的24只蹄子的特定部位共727个组织学样本进行了研究、测量和评估。在组织学上可观察到不同象种足部之间存在细微差异。发现圈养大象蹄子的角质质量较差,以及圈养和野生动物中存在较小阻力的部位。组织学测量显示圈养大象蹄子承重表面的厚度“非常薄”(约10毫米)。正常的组织学发现为评估组织病理学变化尤其是角质质量提供了依据。组织学发现可能解释了一些足部问题,但也引发了关于当前饲养技术质量和正确性的问题。