Gardner Michael J, Krieg James C, Simpson Tamara S, Bottlang Michael
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
J Trauma. 2010 Jan;68(1):159-65. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819adae2.
Determining pelvic ring stability after a fracture is vital to treatment decisions. Commonly used information includes the displacement seen on initial radiographs. Static imaging studies may misrepresent the maximal amount of traumatic displacement at injury. We hypothesized that postinjury radiographs do not reveal maximal displacement of pelvic ring fractures. We also sought to determine whether different injury patterns and varying severity of displacement lead to different amounts of passive recoil.
In 15 cadaveric pelvic specimens, unilateral anteroposterior compression (n = 7) or lateral compression (n = 8) injury patterns were experimentally created. A motion-tracking system was used to record rotational deformity of each hemipelvis before, during, and after fracture creation. The absolute and relative magnitudes of pelvic displacement and recoil after force relaxation were determined.
In the simulated AO/OTA Type 61-B1.1 patterns (open book, rotationally unstable), maximal symphyseal diastasis recoiled by 48% +/- 18% (p < 0.05). In the AO/OTA Type 61-C1.2 patterns (open book, completely unstable), diastasis passively recoiled by 44% +/- 7% (p < 0.05). Lateral compression injuries (AO/OTA Type 61-B2.2) had maximal hemipelvis rotation of 41 degrees +/- 7 degrees and subsequently recoiled by 80% to 8 degrees +/- 6 degrees (p < 0.001).
In this cadaveric model of simulated pelvic injury, a significant magnitude of passive recoil occurred after removal of the deforming force. The amount of recoil varied based on different injury patterns. However, the degree of recoil among specimens with similar injury patterns was generally consistent. In a clinical scenario, this suggests that only a portion of the maximal displacement that occurs at the time of injury is seen on initial plain radiographs. Injury severity should not be minimized based on pelvic displacement seen on initial static radiographs and computed tomographic scans.
确定骨折后骨盆环的稳定性对于治疗决策至关重要。常用信息包括初次X线片上显示的移位情况。静态影像学检查可能无法准确反映损伤时创伤性移位的最大程度。我们推测伤后的X线片无法显示骨盆环骨折的最大移位。我们还试图确定不同的损伤模式和不同程度的移位是否会导致不同程度的被动回弹。
在15个尸体骨盆标本上,通过实验制造单侧前后挤压(n = 7)或侧方挤压(n = 8)损伤模式。使用运动跟踪系统记录每个半骨盆在骨折形成前、骨折形成过程中和骨折形成后的旋转畸形。确定力放松后骨盆移位和回弹的绝对和相对大小。
在模拟的AO/OTA 61-B1.1型模式(开书样,旋转不稳定)中,耻骨联合最大分离回缩了48%±18%(p < 0.05)。在AO/OTA 61-C1.2型模式(开书样,完全不稳定)中,分离被动回缩了44%±7%(p < 0.05)。侧方挤压损伤(AO/OTA 61-B2.2型)半骨盆最大旋转为41度±7度,随后回缩至8度±6度,回缩了80%(p < 0.001)。
在这个模拟骨盆损伤的尸体模型中,去除致伤力后出现了显著程度的被动回弹。回弹量因不同的损伤模式而异。然而,具有相似损伤模式的标本之间的回弹程度总体上是一致的。在临床情况下,这表明初次X线平片上仅能看到损伤时发生的最大移位的一部分。不应根据初次静态X线片和计算机断层扫描上显示的骨盆移位来低估损伤的严重程度。