Suppr超能文献

734 例局限性前列腺癌患者永久性碘 125 植入治疗后长达 10 年的随访中前列腺特异抗原无复发生存率和副作用。

Prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival and side-effects in 734 patients with up to 10 years of follow-up with localized prostate cancer treated by permanent iodine implants.

机构信息

Departments of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2010 Jul;106(1):32-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09096.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

Abstract

STUDY TYPE

Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4.

OBJECTIVE

To report our analysis of the oncological outcome, side-effects and complications after (125)I-brachytherapy, based on 10 years of experience, as low dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy is an accepted, effective and safe therapy for localized prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1999 and December 2006, 734 consecutive patients were treated with clinically localized prostate cancer with a follow-up of >or=30 months. No patients received external beam radiotherapy and 43% received hormonal therapy before brachytherapy; this therapy was given for 3-4 months. All patients had LDR prostate brachytherapy administered by one radiation oncologist. Biochemical failure was defined according to the 'Phoenix consensus'.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the 734 patients was 55 months; 26 had a clinical relapse and 11 died from prostate cancer; 20 patients died from other illnesses. The 10-year actuarial biochemical control was 92%, 84% and 65%, respectively (P < 0.001) for the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups. Multivariate Cox regression analyses identified Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as independent prognostic factors for biochemical failure. The actuarial biochemical control with Gleason score was 88%, 76% and 67% for patients with a Gleason score of <or=6, 7 and >7, respectively (P < 0.001). The biochemical control was 90%, 80% and 42% for patients with a PSA level of <or=10, 10.1-20 and >20 ng/mL, respectively (P < 0.001). No patients reported incontinence after treatment. There was acute urinary retention in 22 (2.9%) patients. Logistic regression showed that the most significant factors correlating with the probability of catheterization were the pretreatment prostate volume and hormonal therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The excellent long-term results and low morbidity, and the many advantages of prostate brachytherapy over other treatments, show that brachytherapy is an effective treatment for clinically organ-confined prostate cancer.

摘要

研究类型

治疗(病例系列)证据水平 4。

目的

报告我们基于 10 年经验对 125I-近距离放射治疗的肿瘤学结果、副作用和并发症的分析,因为低剂量率(LDR)前列腺近距离放射治疗是一种被接受的、有效的和安全的治疗局限性前列腺癌的方法。

患者和方法

1999 年 4 月至 2006 年 12 月期间,734 例连续接受临床局限性前列腺癌治疗的患者接受了随访>30 个月。没有患者接受外部束放射治疗,43%的患者在近距离放射治疗前接受了激素治疗,治疗持续 3-4 个月。所有患者均由一名放射肿瘤学家进行 LDR 前列腺近距离放射治疗。生化失败根据“凤凰共识”定义。

结果

734 例患者的中位随访时间为 55 个月;26 例出现临床复发,11 例死于前列腺癌;20 例死于其他疾病。低、中、高危组的 10 年生化控制的累积率分别为 92%、84%和 65%(P<0.001)。多变量 Cox 回归分析确定 Gleason 评分和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平是生化失败的独立预后因素。Gleason 评分<7 的患者的生化控制累积率为 88%,Gleason 评分 7 和>7 的患者的生化控制累积率分别为 76%和 67%(P<0.001)。PSA 水平<10、10.1-20 和>20ng/ml 的患者的生化控制率分别为 90%、80%和 42%(P<0.001)。治疗后没有患者报告尿失禁。22 例(2.9%)患者出现急性尿潴留。逻辑回归显示,与置管概率最显著相关的因素是治疗前前列腺体积和激素治疗。

结论

近距离放射治疗的长期效果极佳,发病率低,并且与其他治疗方法相比具有许多优势,表明近距离放射治疗是治疗临床局限性前列腺癌的有效方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验