Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Br J Haematol. 2010 Apr;149(1):101-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.08073.x. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
We retrospectively analyzed transfusion requirements within the first 100 d among allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients with haematological malignancies given either myeloablative (n = 1353) or nonmyeloablative conditioning (n = 503). We confirmed that myeloablative recipients required more platelet and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions than nonmyeloablative recipients (P < 0.0001 for both). Myeloablative patients given peripheral blood stem cells required less platelet transfusions (P < 0.0001) than those given marrow while RBC transfusion requirements did not differ significantly. Subsequent analyses were restricted to nonmyeloablative recipients. Platelet and RBC transfusions were less frequent among related compared to unrelated recipients (P < 0.0001 for both), with comparable median numbers of transfused units. Major/bidirectionally ABO-mismatched recipients required more RBC transfusions than ABO-matched recipients (P = 0.006). Rates of graft rejection/failure, grades II-IV acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), 2-year relapse, 3-year survivals and non-relapse mortality were comparable among ABO-matched, minor-mismatched, and major/bidirectionally mismatched recipients (P = 0.93, 0.72, 0.57, 0.36, 0.17 and 0.79, respectively). Times to disappearance of anti-donor IgG and IgM isohemagglutinins among major/bidirectionally ABO-mismatched recipients were affected by magnitude of pre-HCT titres (P < 0.001 for both) but not GVHD (P = 0.71 and 0.78, respectively). In conclusion, nonmyeloablative recipients required fewer platelet and RBC transfusions and among them, both unrelated and major/bidirectionally ABO-mismatched recipients required more RBC transfusions. ABO incompatibility did not affect nonmyeloablative HCT outcomes.
我们回顾性分析了接受异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者在 100 天内的输血需求,这些患者接受了清髓性(n=1353)或非清髓性预处理(n=503)。我们证实,与非清髓性患者相比,清髓性患者需要输注更多的血小板和红细胞(RBC)(两者均 P<0.0001)。接受外周血干细胞移植的清髓性患者需要输注的血小板较少(P<0.0001),而骨髓移植患者的 RBC 输注需求无显著差异。随后的分析仅限于非清髓性患者。与无关供者相比,亲缘供者的血小板和 RBC 输注更不频繁(两者均 P<0.0001),但输注的单位数相当。主要/双向 ABO 不相容的受者比 ABO 相容的受者需要更多的 RBC 输注(P=0.006)。急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)Ⅱ-Ⅳ级、排斥/失败、2 年复发、3 年生存率和非复发死亡率在 ABO 相容、轻度不相容和主要/双向不相容受者之间无差异(分别为 P=0.93、0.72、0.57、0.36、0.17 和 0.79)。主要/双向 ABO 不相容的受者中抗供体 IgG 和 IgM 同种异体血凝素的消失时间受预处理前滴度的影响(两者均 P<0.001),但不受 GVHD 的影响(分别为 P=0.71 和 0.78)。结论:非清髓性患者需要输注较少的血小板和 RBC,其中,无关和主要/双向 ABO 不相容的受者需要更多的 RBC 输注。ABO 不相容性不影响非清髓性 HCT 结局。