Suppr超能文献

联合治疗效果减弱、应答异质性以及治疗不耐受限制了糖尿病患者实现严格危险因素控制的可能性。

Diminishing efficacy of combination therapy, response-heterogeneity, and treatment intolerance limit the attainability of tight risk factor control in patients with diabetes.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;45(2):437-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01075.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the attainability of tight risk factor control targets for three diabetes risk factors and to assess the degree of polypharmacy required.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey-III.

STUDY DESIGN

We simulated a strategy of "treating to targets," exposing subjects to a battery of treatments until low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (100 mg/dL), hemoglobin A1c (7 percent), and blood pressure (130/80 mm Hg) targets were achieved or until all treatments had been exhausted. Regimens included five statins of increasing potency, four A1c-lowering therapies, and eight steps of antihypertensive therapy.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We selected parameter estimates from placebo-controlled trials and meta-analyses.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Under ideal efficacy conditions, 77, 64, and 58 percent of subjects achieved the LDL, A1c, and blood pressure targets, respectively. Successful control depended highly on a subject's baseline number of treatments. Using the least favorable assumptions of treatment tolerance, success rates were 11-17 percentage points lower. Approximately 57 percent of subjects required five or more medication classes.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of people with diabetes will fail to achieve targets despite using high doses of multiple, conventional treatments. These findings raise concerns about the feasibility and polypharmacy burden needed for tight risk factor control, and the use of measures of tight control to assess the quality of care for diabetes.

摘要

目的

评估实现三种糖尿病风险因素严格控制目标的可能性,并评估所需的多药治疗程度。

资料来源/研究设置:国家健康和营养调查 III 期。

研究设计

我们模拟了一种“达标治疗”策略,让受试者接受一系列治疗,直到达到低密脂蛋白胆固醇(100mg/dL)、糖化血红蛋白(7%)和血压(130/80mmHg)目标,或者所有治疗都已用尽。方案包括五种效力递增的他汀类药物、四种降低 A1c 的治疗方法和八种降压治疗步骤。

资料收集/提取方法:我们从安慰剂对照试验和荟萃分析中选择了参数估计。

主要发现

在理想疗效条件下,分别有 77%、64%和 58%的受试者达到了 LDL、A1c 和血压目标。成功控制高度依赖于受试者的基线治疗次数。在假设治疗耐受性最不利的情况下,成功率降低了 11-17 个百分点。大约 57%的受试者需要使用五种或更多的药物类别。

结论

尽管使用了高剂量的多种常规治疗方法,但相当一部分糖尿病患者仍无法达到目标。这些发现引发了对严格控制风险因素的可行性和多药治疗负担的担忧,并对使用严格控制措施来评估糖尿病护理质量提出了质疑。

相似文献

4
Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2219-2228. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2032271.
5
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
7

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment effect modification due to comorbidity: Individual participant data meta-analyses of 120 randomised controlled trials.
PLoS Med. 2023 Jun 6;20(6):e1004176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004176. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Constructing dynamic treatment regimes with shared parameters for censored data.
Stat Med. 2020 Apr 30;39(9):1250-1263. doi: 10.1002/sim.8473. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
3
6
Cost-effectiveness of hypertension therapy according to 2014 guidelines.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):447-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1406751.
7
Do treatment quality indicators predict cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes?
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e78821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078821. eCollection 2013.
8
Using benefit-based tailored treatment to improve the use of antihypertensive medications.
Circulation. 2013 Nov 19;128(21):2309-17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002290. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

本文引用的文献

2
Beyond the randomized clinical trial: the role of effectiveness studies in evaluating cardiovascular therapies.
Circulation. 2008 Sep 16;118(12):1294-303. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.703579.
3
Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2560-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802987. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
4
Redefining quality--implications of recent clinical trials.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2537-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0803740. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
5
Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 3;358(14):1431-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800742. Epub 2008 Mar 30.
6
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2008.
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jan;31 Suppl 1:S12-54. doi: 10.2337/dc08-S012.
8
Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 14;356(24):2457-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072761. Epub 2007 May 21.
9
Narrative review: lack of evidence for recommended low-density lipoprotein treatment targets: a solvable problem.
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Oct 3;145(7):520-30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-7-200610030-00010.
10
Antihypertensive medication prescribing in 27,822 elderly Canadians with diabetes over the past decade.
Diabetes Care. 2006 Apr;29(4):836-41. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.04.06.dc05-1875.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验