• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合治疗效果减弱、应答异质性以及治疗不耐受限制了糖尿病患者实现严格危险因素控制的可能性。

Diminishing efficacy of combination therapy, response-heterogeneity, and treatment intolerance limit the attainability of tight risk factor control in patients with diabetes.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;45(2):437-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01075.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01075.x
PMID:20070387
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2838154/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the attainability of tight risk factor control targets for three diabetes risk factors and to assess the degree of polypharmacy required.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey-III.

STUDY DESIGN

We simulated a strategy of "treating to targets," exposing subjects to a battery of treatments until low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (100 mg/dL), hemoglobin A1c (7 percent), and blood pressure (130/80 mm Hg) targets were achieved or until all treatments had been exhausted. Regimens included five statins of increasing potency, four A1c-lowering therapies, and eight steps of antihypertensive therapy.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We selected parameter estimates from placebo-controlled trials and meta-analyses.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Under ideal efficacy conditions, 77, 64, and 58 percent of subjects achieved the LDL, A1c, and blood pressure targets, respectively. Successful control depended highly on a subject's baseline number of treatments. Using the least favorable assumptions of treatment tolerance, success rates were 11-17 percentage points lower. Approximately 57 percent of subjects required five or more medication classes.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of people with diabetes will fail to achieve targets despite using high doses of multiple, conventional treatments. These findings raise concerns about the feasibility and polypharmacy burden needed for tight risk factor control, and the use of measures of tight control to assess the quality of care for diabetes.

摘要

目的

评估实现三种糖尿病风险因素严格控制目标的可能性,并评估所需的多药治疗程度。

资料来源/研究设置:国家健康和营养调查 III 期。

研究设计

我们模拟了一种“达标治疗”策略,让受试者接受一系列治疗,直到达到低密脂蛋白胆固醇(100mg/dL)、糖化血红蛋白(7%)和血压(130/80mmHg)目标,或者所有治疗都已用尽。方案包括五种效力递增的他汀类药物、四种降低 A1c 的治疗方法和八种降压治疗步骤。

资料收集/提取方法:我们从安慰剂对照试验和荟萃分析中选择了参数估计。

主要发现

在理想疗效条件下,分别有 77%、64%和 58%的受试者达到了 LDL、A1c 和血压目标。成功控制高度依赖于受试者的基线治疗次数。在假设治疗耐受性最不利的情况下,成功率降低了 11-17 个百分点。大约 57%的受试者需要使用五种或更多的药物类别。

结论

尽管使用了高剂量的多种常规治疗方法,但相当一部分糖尿病患者仍无法达到目标。这些发现引发了对严格控制风险因素的可行性和多药治疗负担的担忧,并对使用严格控制措施来评估糖尿病护理质量提出了质疑。

相似文献

1
Diminishing efficacy of combination therapy, response-heterogeneity, and treatment intolerance limit the attainability of tight risk factor control in patients with diabetes.联合治疗效果减弱、应答异质性以及治疗不耐受限制了糖尿病患者实现严格危险因素控制的可能性。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;45(2):437-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01075.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
2
Variation in the net benefit of aggressive cardiovascular risk factor control across the US population of patients with diabetes mellitus.美国糖尿病患者群体中积极控制心血管危险因素的净效益差异。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 28;170(12):1037-44. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.150.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018.美国成年人糖尿病治疗和控制的趋势,1999-2018 年。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2219-2228. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2032271.
5
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
6
Impact of switching from different treatment regimens to a fixed-dose combination pill (polypill) in patients with cardiovascular disease or similarly high risk.心血管疾病患者或具有类似高风险的患者从不同治疗方案转换为固定剂量复方药丸(多效药丸)的影响。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Jun;24(9):951-961. doi: 10.1177/2047487317695616. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
7
8
A retrospective cohort study of correlates of response to pharmacologic therapy for hyperlipidemia in members of a managed care organization.一项针对管理式医疗组织成员中高脂血症药物治疗反应相关因素的回顾性队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2003 Nov;25(11):2936-57. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80346-6.
9
Effect of fixed dose combination treatment on adherence and risk factor control among patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: randomised controlled trial in primary care.固定剂量联合治疗对心血管疾病高危患者依从性和危险因素控制的影响:初级保健中的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2014 May 27;348:g3318. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3318.
10
AMG 145, a monoclonal antibody against PCSK9, facilitates achievement of national cholesterol education program-adult treatment panel III low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals among high-risk patients: an analysis from the LAPLACE-TIMI 57 trial (LDL-C assessment with PCSK9 monoclonal antibody inhibition combined with statin thErapy-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 57).AMG 145,一种针对 PCSK9 的单克隆抗体,可帮助高危患者实现国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗专家组 III 低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标:来自 LAPLACE-TIMI 57 试验的分析(使用 PCSK9 单克隆抗体抑制联合他汀类药物治疗进行 LDL-C 评估 - 心肌梗死溶栓治疗 57)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 11;63(5):430-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.048. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment effect modification due to comorbidity: Individual participant data meta-analyses of 120 randomised controlled trials.由于合并症导致的治疗效果改变:120 项随机对照试验的个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2023 Jun 6;20(6):e1004176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004176. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Constructing dynamic treatment regimes with shared parameters for censored data.为删失数据构建具有共享参数的动态治疗方案。
Stat Med. 2020 Apr 30;39(9):1250-1263. doi: 10.1002/sim.8473. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
3
Incremental effects of antihypertensive drugs: instrumental variable analysis.抗高血压药物的增量效应:工具变量分析
BMJ. 2017 Dec 22;359:j5542. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5542.
4
Detecting Heterogeneous Treatment Effects to Guide Personalized Blood Pressure Treatment: A Modeling Study of Randomized Clinical Trials.检测异质性治疗效果以指导个性化血压治疗:一项随机临床试验的建模研究
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Mar 7;166(5):354-360. doi: 10.7326/M16-1756. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
5
Polypharmacy in the Aging Patient: A Review of Glycemic Control in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.老年患者的多重用药:2型糖尿病老年人血糖控制的综述
JAMA. 2016 Mar 8;315(10):1034-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0299.
6
Cost-effectiveness of hypertension therapy according to 2014 guidelines.根据2014年指南的高血压治疗成本效益
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):447-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1406751.
7
Do treatment quality indicators predict cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes?治疗质量指标能否预测糖尿病患者的心血管结局?
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e78821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078821. eCollection 2013.
8
Using benefit-based tailored treatment to improve the use of antihypertensive medications.采用基于获益的个体化治疗来改善降压药物的使用。
Circulation. 2013 Nov 19;128(21):2309-17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002290. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
9
Cardiac risk is not associated with hypertension treatment intensification.心脏风险与高血压治疗强化无关。
Am J Manag Care. 2012 Aug;18(8):414-20.
10
Improving blood pressure control through a clinical pharmacist outreach program in patients with diabetes mellitus in 2 high-performing health systems: the adherence and intensification of medications cluster randomized, controlled pragmatic trial.通过在 2 个高绩效医疗系统中对患有糖尿病的患者开展临床药师外展项目来改善血压控制:药物依从性和强化治疗群组随机、对照实用试验。
Circulation. 2012 Jun 12;125(23):2863-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.089169. Epub 2012 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the reliability of physician performance assessment: identifying the "physician effect" on quality and creating composite measures.提高医生绩效评估的可靠性:识别医生对医疗质量的“影响”并制定综合指标。
Med Care. 2009 Apr;47(4):378-87. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818dce07.
2
Beyond the randomized clinical trial: the role of effectiveness studies in evaluating cardiovascular therapies.超越随机临床试验:有效性研究在评估心血管治疗中的作用。
Circulation. 2008 Sep 16;118(12):1294-303. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.703579.
3
Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者强化血糖控制与血管转归
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2560-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802987. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
4
Redefining quality--implications of recent clinical trials.重新定义质量——近期临床试验的影响
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2537-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0803740. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
5
Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia.辛伐他汀联合或不联合依折麦布治疗家族性高胆固醇血症
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 3;358(14):1431-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800742. Epub 2008 Mar 30.
6
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2008.2008年糖尿病医疗护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jan;31 Suppl 1:S12-54. doi: 10.2337/dc08-S012.
7
The role of fibrates in the prevention of cardiovascular disease--a pooled meta-analysis of long-term randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials.贝特类药物在预防心血管疾病中的作用——长期随机安慰剂对照临床试验的汇总荟萃分析
Am Heart J. 2007 Nov;154(5):943-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.011. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
8
Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes.罗格列酮对心肌梗死风险及心血管原因所致死亡的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 14;356(24):2457-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072761. Epub 2007 May 21.
9
Narrative review: lack of evidence for recommended low-density lipoprotein treatment targets: a solvable problem.叙述性综述:推荐的低密度脂蛋白治疗靶点缺乏证据:一个可解决的问题。
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Oct 3;145(7):520-30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-7-200610030-00010.
10
Antihypertensive medication prescribing in 27,822 elderly Canadians with diabetes over the past decade.过去十年间27822名患有糖尿病的加拿大老年人的降压药物处方情况。
Diabetes Care. 2006 Apr;29(4):836-41. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.04.06.dc05-1875.