相似文献
1
Ashley revisited: a response to the peer commentaries.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):W4-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160903493021.
2
Putting law in the room.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):48-50. doi: 10.1080/15265160903461010.
3
The limits of parental authority?
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):50-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160903460871.
4
Ashley's interests were not violated because she does not have the necessary interests.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):52-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160903460863.
5
Growth attenuation: good intentions, bad decision.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):46-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160903441111.
6
It's not the growth attenuation, it's the sterilization!
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):45-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160903441079.
7
Revisiting the relevance of the social model of disability.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):54-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160903460913.
8
Ashley revisited: a response to the critics.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):30-44. doi: 10.1080/15265160903469336.
9
Ethics or advocacy?
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):59-60. doi: 10.1080/15265160903460962.
10
What took so long? The disability critique recognized.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):57-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160903460954.
Zotero 插件