• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

朋友还是敌人?自我参照启发式的差异使用作为关系满意度的函数。

Friend or foe? Differential use of the self-based heuristic as a function of relationship satisfaction.

机构信息

Decision Research, Eugene, OR 97401, USA.

出版信息

J Pers. 2009 Jun;77(3):731-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00563.x. Epub 2009 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00563.x
PMID:20078736
Abstract

We report two studies investigating whether relationship satisfaction differentially influences the use of the "self-based heuristic" (SBH) or the degree to which an individual's own characteristics contribute to ratings of another's personality. Individuals rated themselves, a friend, and a person with whom they have experienced significant conflict (a "foe"); ratings were made on measures of the Big Five and trait affectivity. Replicating previous research, judges made greater use of the SBH when rating trait affectivity than when rating the Big Five. In addition, individuals were more likely to utilize the SBH when rating friends than when rating foes. Further, relationship satisfaction made significant independent contributions in accounting for the variance in trait ratings of others. These findings extend our understanding of the mechanisms involved with person perception beyond observable trait-related information.

摘要

我们报告了两项研究,旨在探讨关系满意度是否会对使用“自我为基础的启发式”(SBH)或个体自身特征对他人人格评价的贡献程度产生不同影响。个体对自己、朋友和经历过重大冲突的人(“敌人”)进行评价;评价采用大五人格和特质情感两个量表。研究结果与之前的研究一致,在评价特质情感时,判断者比在评价大五人格时更倾向于使用 SBH。此外,在评价朋友时,个体更倾向于使用 SBH,而在评价敌人时则不然。此外,关系满意度对他人特质评价的差异有显著的独立贡献。这些发现扩展了我们对涉及到个体感知的机制的理解,超越了可观察的与特质相关的信息。

相似文献

1
Friend or foe? Differential use of the self-based heuristic as a function of relationship satisfaction.朋友还是敌人?自我参照启发式的差异使用作为关系满意度的函数。
J Pers. 2009 Jun;77(3):731-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00563.x. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
2
Asymmetry in judgments of personality: others are less differentiated than the self.人格判断中的不对称性:他人比自我的区分度更低。
J Pers. 2008 Jun;76(3):535-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00495.x. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
3
Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: a social network approach.新兴的青少年后期友谊网络与大五人格特质:社会网络方法。
J Pers. 2010 Apr;78(2):509-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00625.x.
4
Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior.行为中特质内容表现所基于的情境性偶然因素。
J Pers. 2007 Aug;75(4):825-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x.
5
Perceiver effects as projective tests: what your perceptions of others say about you.知觉者效应作为投射测验:他人对你的看法反映了你自己。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jul;99(1):174-90. doi: 10.1037/a0019390.
6
Relational-interdependent self-construal as a predictor of relationship quality: the mediating roles of one's own behaviors and perceptions of the fulfillment of friendship functions.关系相互依存自我构念作为关系质量的预测指标:自身行为及对友谊功能实现感知的中介作用
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;149(3):305-22. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.149.3.305-322.
7
What it pays to know about a close other: the value of if-then personality knowledge in close relationships.了解亲密他人的好处:情境人格知识在亲密关系中的价值。
Psychol Sci. 2011 May;22(5):567-71. doi: 10.1177/0956797611405676. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
8
Self-esteem and organization of valenced information about others: the "Jekyll and Hyde"-ing of relationship partners.自尊与对他人有价值信息的组织:关系伙伴的“杰基尔与海德”现象。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Apr;90(4):652-65. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.652.
9
What friends are for! The use of routine standards in social comparison.朋友的作用!社会比较中常规标准的运用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Sep;85(3):467-81. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.467.
10
Narcissism and the self-evaluation maintenance model: effects of social comparison threats on relationship closeness.自恋和自我评价维持模型:社会比较威胁对关系亲密的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2011 Mar-Apr;151(2):201-12. doi: 10.1080/00224540903510852.