Thailand Ministry of Public Health-U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Int J Drug Policy. 2010 Jul;21(4):296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
HIV spread rapidly amongst injecting drug users (IDUs) in Bangkok in the late 1980s. In recent years, changes in the drugs injected by IDUs have been observed. We examined data from an HIV vaccine trial conducted amongst IDUs in Bangkok during 1999-2003 to describe drug injection practices, drugs injected, and determine if drug use choices altered the risk of incident HIV infection.
The AIDSVAX B/E HIV vaccine trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. At enrolment and every 6 months thereafter, HIV status and risk behaviour were assessed. A proportional hazards model was used to evaluate demographic characteristics, incarceration, drug injection practices, sexual activity, and drugs injected during follow-up as independent predictors of HIV infection.
The proportion of participants injecting drugs, sharing needles, and injecting daily declined from baseline to month 36. Amongst participants who injected, the proportion injecting heroin declined (98.6-91.9%), whilst the proportions injecting methamphetamine (16.2-19.6%) and midazolam (9.9-31.9%) increased. HIV incidence was highest amongst participants injecting methamphetamine, 7.1 (95% CI, 5.4-9.2) per 100 person years. Injecting heroin and injecting methamphetamine were independently associated with incident HIV infection.
Amongst AIDSVAX B/E vaccine trial participants who injected drugs during follow-up, the proportion injecting heroin declined whilst the proportion injecting methamphetamine, midazolam, or combinations of these drugs increased. Controlling for heroin use and other risk factors, participants injecting methamphetamine were more likely to become HIV-infected than participants not injecting methamphetamine. Additional HIV prevention tools are urgently needed including tools that address methamphetamine use.
20 世纪 80 年代末,曼谷的注射吸毒者(IDU)中艾滋病毒迅速传播。近年来,IDU 注射的毒品发生了变化。我们检查了 1999 年至 2003 年期间在曼谷进行的一项艾滋病毒疫苗试验的数据,以描述药物注射行为、注射的药物,并确定药物使用选择是否改变了艾滋病毒感染的风险。
AIDSVAX B/E HIV 疫苗试验是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。在入组时和之后的每 6 个月,评估 HIV 状况和风险行为。使用比例风险模型评估人口统计学特征、监禁、药物注射行为、性活动以及随访期间注射的药物作为 HIV 感染的独立预测因素。
从基线到第 36 个月,注射毒品、共用针头和每天注射的参与者比例下降。在注射的参与者中,注射海洛因的比例下降(98.6-91.9%),而注射甲基苯丙胺(16.2-19.6%)和咪达唑仑(9.9-31.9%)的比例增加。HIV 发病率最高的是注射甲基苯丙胺的参与者,每 100 人年 7.1(95%CI,5.4-9.2)。注射海洛因和注射甲基苯丙胺与 HIV 感染的发生独立相关。
在 AIDSVAX B/E 疫苗试验期间注射毒品的参与者中,注射海洛因的比例下降,而注射甲基苯丙胺、咪达唑仑或这些药物的组合增加。在控制海洛因使用和其他危险因素的情况下,注射甲基苯丙胺的参与者比不注射甲基苯丙胺的参与者更有可能感染 HIV。迫切需要额外的艾滋病毒预防工具,包括解决甲基苯丙胺使用问题的工具。