Bouattour L, Ben Abbes N, Essefi A, Derbel M, Gargouri F, Bouaziz Y, Ghorbel A, Maatoug S, Keskes H, Karoui A
Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, hôpital Habib Bourguiba, 06, rue Hédi Chaker, Sfax 3000, Tunisie.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2010 Jan;29(1):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2009.09.015. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
The usual technique of parasacral sciatic nerve block seems an approach easily achieved, however, the ischial tuberosity is difficult to palpate. [1] The purpose of the study was to propose new skin landmarks improved by an anatomical and clinical study.
Three cadaver dissections made previously have shown that our skin landmarks appeared correct. Twenty consenting patients, ASA I to III, proposed for lower limb surgery, were included in this descriptive and prospective study. The patient was positioned in the Sim position. A line was drawn between the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the sacral hiatus (HS). A second line was drawn from the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and perpendicular to the 1st line. The puncture site (P) was the intersection of these two lines. At point P, the needle was inserted perpendicularly to the skin. Twenty milliliters of a mixture of lidocaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% were injected after obtaining an appropriate motor response. Sensory block was assessed 30 minutes after performing block in the territories of the tibial nerve, peroneal and posterior cutaneous of thigh. Parasacral block success was defined by the extension of sensory block in the territories of the tibial and fibular nerves. Complications were noted. An independent observer recorded: the time to perform blocks, the depth of the sciatic nerve, the number of needle redirections, the quality of nerve block of patient, and patient satisfaction.
The success rate was 95% (19 of 20 cases). Seventy-five percent of blocks were performed by residents on training. The point P was determined at the first attempt. The time required to perform the block was 3 + or - 1.7 min and depth of the sciatic nerve was 81 + or - 17 mm. The rate of patient satisfaction was 85%. One vascular puncture was observed. We have not noted other complications.
Access to the sciatic foramen appears to be facilitated by these new surface landmarks, which are simple and reliable. Our new skin landmarks seemed valid for all morphotypes.
骶旁坐骨神经阻滞的常规技术似乎是一种易于实现的方法,然而,坐骨结节难以触及。[1] 本研究的目的是通过解剖学和临床研究提出改进的新皮肤标志。
先前进行的三次尸体解剖表明我们的皮肤标志是正确的。本描述性前瞻性研究纳入了20例拟行下肢手术的患者,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I至III级。患者取侧卧位。在前上棘(ASIS)和骶裂孔(HS)之间画一条线。从后上棘(PSIS)画第二条线并垂直于第一条线。穿刺点(P)为这两条线的交点。在点P处,将针垂直于皮肤插入。在获得适当的运动反应后,注射20毫升2%利多卡因和0.5%布比卡因的混合液。在阻滞操作30分钟后,在胫神经、腓总神经和股后皮神经支配区域评估感觉阻滞。骶旁阻滞成功的定义为胫神经和腓总神经支配区域感觉阻滞的范围。记录并发症情况。一名独立观察者记录:进行阻滞的时间、坐骨神经的深度、针重新定向的次数、患者神经阻滞的质量以及患者满意度。
成功率为95%(20例中的19例)。75%的阻滞由正在培训的住院医师进行。第一次尝试就确定了点P。进行阻滞所需时间为3±1.7分钟,坐骨神经深度为81±17毫米。患者满意度为85%。观察到1次血管穿刺。未发现其他并发症。
这些新的体表标志似乎便于进入坐骨孔,它们简单且可靠。我们的新皮肤标志似乎对所有体型类型都有效。