School of Chemical & Bioprocess Engineering, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2010 Mar 25;155(1-2):5-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
Mixtures of the two non-ionic surfactants hexaoxyethylene dodecyl ether (C(12)E(6)) and n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside (beta-C(12)G(2)) were studied with regard to surface properties, bulk properties, foam films, and foams. The reason for studying a mixture of an ethylene oxide (C(i)E(j)) and a sugar (C(n)G(m)) based surfactant is that despite being non-ionic, these two surfactants behave quite differently. Firstly, the physico-chemical properties of aqueous solutions of C(n)G(m) surfactants are less temperature-sensitive than those of C(i)E(j) solutions. Secondly, the surface charge density q(0) of foam films stabilized by C(n)G(m) surfactants is pH insensitive down to the so-called isoelectric point, while that of foam films stabilized by C(i)E(j) surfactants changes linearly with the pH. The third difference is related to interaction forces between solid surfaces. Under equilibrium conditions very high forces are needed to expel beta-C(12)G(2) from between thiolated gold surfaces, while for C(12)E(6) low loads are sufficient. Fourthly, the adsorption of C(12)E(6) and beta-C(12)G(2) on hydrophilic silica and titania, respectively, is inverted. While the surface excess of C(12)E(6) is large on silica and negligible on titania, beta-C(12)G(2) adsorbs very little on silica but has a large surface excess on titania. What is the reason for this different behaviour? Under similar conditions and for comparable head group sizes, it was found that the hydration of C(i)E(j) surfactants is one order of magnitude higher but on average much weaker than that of C(n)G(m) surfactants. Moreover, C(n)G(m) surfactants possess a rigid maltoside unit, while C(i)E(j) surfactants have a very flexible hydrophilic part. Indeed, most of the different properties mentioned above can be explained by the different hydration and the head group flexibilities. The intriguing question of how mixtures of C(i)E(j) and C(n)G(m) surfactants would behave arises organically. Thus various properties of C(12)E(6)+beta-C(12)G(2) mixtures in aqueous solution have been studied with a focus on the 1:1 mixture. The results are compared with those of the single surfactants and are discussed accordingly.
将两种非离子表面活性剂——己氧基十二烷(C(12)E(6))和正十二烷基-β-D-麦芽糖苷(β-C(12)G(2))混合,研究了其表面性质、体相性质、泡沫膜和泡沫。选择研究基于环氧乙烷(C(i)E(j))和糖(C(n)G(m))的混合物表面活性剂的原因是,尽管它们是非离子的,但这两种表面活性剂的行为却有很大的不同。首先,C(n)G(m)表面活性剂水溶液的物理化学性质对温度的敏感性不如 C(i)E(j)溶液强。其次,由 C(n)G(m)表面活性剂稳定的泡沫膜的表面电荷密度 q(0)在所谓的等电点以下对 pH 不敏感,而由 C(i)E(j)表面活性剂稳定的泡沫膜的表面电荷密度 q(0)随 pH 值呈线性变化。第三个区别与固-液界面相互作用有关。在平衡条件下,需要很高的力才能将β-C(12)G(2)从巯基化金表面挤出,而对于 C(12)E(6),只需施加低负荷即可。第四,C(12)E(6)和β-C(12)G(2)在亲水性二氧化硅和二氧化钛上的吸附是相反的。虽然 C(12)E(6)在二氧化硅上的表面过剩量很大,而在二氧化钛上几乎可以忽略不计,但β-C(12)G(2)在二氧化硅上的吸附量很小,而在二氧化钛上的表面过剩量很大。造成这种不同行为的原因是什么?在类似的条件下,对于可比的头基大小,发现 C(i)E(j)表面活性剂的水合作用高一个数量级,但平均强度要弱得多。此外,C(n)G(m)表面活性剂具有刚性麦芽糖单元,而 C(i)E(j)表面活性剂具有非常灵活的亲水部分。事实上,上述大部分不同的性质都可以用不同的水合作用和头基柔韧性来解释。因此,C(i)E(j)和 C(n)G(m)表面活性剂混合物的性质如何成为一个自然而然的问题。因此,本文研究了水溶液中 C(12)E(6)+β-C(12)G(2)混合物的各种性质,重点研究了 1:1 混合物。将结果与单一表面活性剂的结果进行了比较,并进行了相应的讨论。