• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

良心拒斥与护士:一项权利还是一种特权?

Conscientious objection and the nurse: a right or a privilege?

作者信息

McHale Jean V

机构信息

School of Law, University of Birmingham.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 2009;18(20):1262-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.20.45122.

DOI:10.12968/bjon.2009.18.20.45122
PMID:20081664
Abstract

This article examines to what extent nurses can at present opt out of clinical procedures on the basis of conscience in English law. It considers the current rights to opt out on the basis of conscience contained in section 4 of the Abortion Act 1967 and section 38 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. It examines how through codes of practice and guidance, there is recognition of the ability to opt out beyond theses statutes. It suggests that rather than let practice evolve to enable persons to opt out, the fundamental issues as to whether it should be a right or a privilege needs careful consideration across healthcare professions as a whole and a broader public debate.

摘要

本文探讨了目前在英国法律中,护士基于良心拒行临床程序的程度。它考量了1967年《堕胎法》第4条和1990年《人类受精与胚胎学法》第38条中目前基于良心拒行的权利。它研究了如何通过实践守则和指南,人们认识到在这些法规之外也有拒行的能力。它表明,与其让实践自行发展以使人们能够拒行,对于这究竟应是一项权利还是一种特权的根本问题,需要整个医疗行业进行审慎考虑并展开更广泛的公众辩论。

相似文献

1
Conscientious objection and the nurse: a right or a privilege?良心拒斥与护士:一项权利还是一种特权?
Br J Nurs. 2009;18(20):1262-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.20.45122.
2
[Conscientious objection in the clinical setting. A proposal for its appropriate use].[临床环境中的良心拒斥。关于其合理使用的提议]
Rev Calid Asist. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 May 2.
3
Conscientious objection to abortion and reproductive healthcare: a review of recent literature and implications for adolescents.对堕胎和生殖健康护理的良心拒斥:近期文献综述及对青少年的影响
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;27(5):333-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000196.
4
[Conscientious objection in medical practice].[医疗实践中的良心拒斥]
Rev Med Chil. 2015 Apr;143(4):493-8. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872015000400011.
5
The Legal Ethical Backbone of Conscientious Refusal.良心拒绝的法律伦理支柱。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Jan;26(1):59-68. doi: 10.1017/S0963180116000645.
6
Consequences for patients of health care professionals' conscientious actions: the ban on abortions in South Australia.医疗保健专业人员出于良心的行为给患者带来的后果:南澳大利亚州的堕胎禁令。
J Med Ethics. 1994 Jun;20(2):80-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.2.80.
7
Legal briefing: conscience clauses and conscientious refusal.法律简报:良心条款与良心拒绝
J Clin Ethics. 2010 Summer;21(2):163-76.
8
Conscientious refusal in healthcare: the Swedish solution.医疗保健中的良心拒绝:瑞典的解决方案。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr;43(4):257-259. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103752. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
9
The scope and limits of conscientious objection.良心拒服兵役的范围与限制。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000 Oct;71(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(00)00330-1.
10
The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law.英国医学协会关于依良心拒医的指导意见可能违反人权法。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr;43(4):260-263. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103222. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
An ethical issue: nurses' conscientious objection regarding induced abortion in South Korea.一个伦理问题:韩国护士对人工流产的良心拒斥
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Oct 27;21(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00552-9.
2
Tensions Between Ethics and the Law: Examination of a Legal Case by Two Midwives Invoking a Conscientious Objection to Abortion in Scotland.伦理与法律之间的紧张关系:苏格兰两名助产士以堕胎为良心拒绝对一个法律案件的审查。
HEC Forum. 2021 Sep;33(3):189-213. doi: 10.1007/s10730-019-09378-4.