Anastasov Vladimir, Khamis Ibrahim
IAEA NPTDS, Wagramerstrasse 5, P.O.Box 100, Vienna, Austria.
J Environ Monit. 2010 Jan;12(1):50-7. doi: 10.1039/b907794d. Epub 2009 Jul 11.
Nuclear desalination has been identified as an option since the 1960s, but only recently, as climate change intensifies, has it gained interest again. Although environmental impacts of nuclear desalination have not been paid a lot of attention in the few implemented projects, now more than ever, it is essential to provide an overview of their nature and magnitude. The gathered information and basic analysis allow for a general comparison of a 200,000 m(3)/d nuclear desalination facility using a once-through cooling system as a reference case, with alternative co-location options. Results of the review indicate that the potential for marine impacts requires careful planning and monitoring. They also reveal that adverse coastal, atmospheric and socio-economic impacts are minor in comparison with other co-location alternatives. The issues regarding public health are discussed and experiences presented. Nuclear desalination facilities are expected to show a better environmental performance than other co-located power/desalination options. Environmental planning and monitoring activities are thus much simpler and their scope smaller, with the most important monitoring parameters listed. In conclusion, the application of nuclear desalination is recommended as a less environmentally harmful option.
自20世纪60年代以来,核能淡化就被视为一种选择,但直到最近,随着气候变化加剧,它才再次引起人们的关注。尽管在少数已实施的项目中,核能淡化对环境的影响并未得到太多关注,但现在比以往任何时候都更有必要概述其性质和程度。收集到的信息和基本分析使得能够将一个采用直流冷却系统、日产20万立方米的核能淡化设施作为参考案例,与其他共址方案进行总体比较。审查结果表明,海洋影响的可能性需要仔细规划和监测。结果还显示,与其他共址方案相比,不利的沿海、大气和社会经济影响较小。文中讨论了与公众健康相关的问题并介绍了相关经验。预计核能淡化设施的环境表现将优于其他共址的发电/淡化方案。因此,环境规划和监测活动要简单得多,范围也更小,并列出了最重要的监测参数。总之,建议将核能淡化作为对环境危害较小的一种选择加以应用。