Sracek Ondra, Armienta María Aurora, Rodríguez Ramiro, Villaseñor Guadalupe
OPV s.r.o. (Protection of groundwater Ltd), Belohorská 31, 169 00, Praha 6, Czech Republic.
J Environ Monit. 2010 Jan;12(1):329-37. doi: 10.1039/b911873j. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
There are two principal sources of arsenic in Zimapán. Point sources are linked to mining and smelting activities and especially to mine tailings. Diffuse sources are not well defined and are linked to regional flow systems in carbonate rocks. Both sources are caused by the oxidation of arsenic-rich sulfidic mineralization. Point sources are characterized by Ca-SO(4)-HCO(3) ground water type and relatively enriched values of deltaD, delta(18)O, and delta(34)S(SO(4)). Diffuse sources are characterized by Ca-Na-HCO(3) type of ground water and more depleted values of deltaD, delta(18)O, and delta(34)S(SO(4)). Values of deltaD and delta(18)O indicate similar altitude of recharge for both arsenic sources and stronger impact of evaporation for point sources in mine tailings. There are also different values of delta(34)S(SO(4)) for both sources, presumably due to different types of mineralization or isotopic zonality in deposits. In Principal Component Analysis (PCA), the principal component 1 (PC1), which describes the impact of sulfide oxidation and neutralization by the dissolution of carbonates, has higher values in samples from point sources. In spite of similar concentrations of As in ground water affected by diffuse sources and point sources (mean values 0.21 mg L(-1) and 0.31 mg L(-1), respectively, in the years from 2003 to 2008), the diffuse sources have more impact on the health of population in Zimapán. This is caused by the extraction of ground water from wells tapping regional flow system. In contrast, wells located in the proximity of mine tailings are not generally used for water supply.
齐马潘地区有两个主要的砷源。点源与采矿和冶炼活动有关,特别是与尾矿有关。面源不太明确,与碳酸盐岩中的区域水流系统有关。这两种来源都是由富含砷的硫化矿化氧化引起的。点源的特征是Ca-SO(4)-HCO(3)型地下水以及δD、δ(18)O和δ(34)S(SO(4))相对富集的值。面源的特征是Ca-Na-HCO(3)型地下水以及δD、δ(18)O和δ(34)S(SO(4))更贫化的值。δD和δ(18)O的值表明两种砷源的补给高度相似,且尾矿点源受蒸发影响更强。两种来源的δ(34)S(SO(4))值也不同,可能是由于矿化类型不同或矿床中的同位素分带所致。在主成分分析(PCA)中,描述硫化物氧化和碳酸盐溶解中和影响的主成分1(PC1)在点源样品中的值较高。尽管受面源和点源影响的地下水中砷的浓度相似(2003年至2008年期间平均值分别为0.21 mg L(-1)和0.31 mg L(-1)),但面源对齐马潘地区居民健康的影响更大。这是由于从开采区域水流系统的水井中抽取地下水所致。相比之下,位于尾矿附近的水井一般不用于供水。