Academic Unit of Genetic Medicine, Human Genetics Division, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, UK.
FEBS J. 2010 Feb;277(4):836-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07519.x. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
Nucleotide variations that do not alter the protein-coding sequence have been routinely considered as neutral. In light of the developments we have seen over the last decade or so in the RNA processing and translational field, it would be proper when assessing these variants to ask if this change is neutral, good or bad. This question has been recently partly addressed by genome-wide in silico analysis but significantly fewer cases by laboratory experimental examples. Of particular relevance is the effect these mutations have on the pre-mRNA splicing pattern. In fact, alterations in this process may occur as a consequence of translationally silent mutations leading to the expression of novel splicing isoforms and/or loss of an existing one. This phenomenon can either generate new substrates for evolution or cause genetic disease when aberrant isoforms altering the essential protein function are produced. In this review we briefly describe the current understanding in the field and discuss emerging directions in the study of the splicing mechanism by integrating disease-causing splicing mutations and evolutionary changes.
核苷酸变异如果不改变蛋白质编码序列,通常被认为是中性的。鉴于我们在过去十年左右的 RNA 处理和翻译领域看到的发展,在评估这些变体时,询问这种变化是中性的、好的还是坏的是恰当的。这个问题最近已经部分通过全基因组计算机分析得到解决,但通过实验室实验例子解决的则要少得多。特别相关的是这些突变对前体 mRNA 剪接模式的影响。事实上,这种过程的改变可能是由于翻译沉默突变导致新型剪接异构体的表达和/或现有异构体的丢失而发生的。这种现象既可以为进化产生新的底物,也可以在产生改变必需蛋白质功能的异常异构体时导致遗传疾病。在这篇综述中,我们简要描述了该领域的现有理解,并通过整合导致剪接突变和进化改变的疾病相关剪接突变,讨论了剪接机制研究的新方向。