• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根尖片和曲面断层片上的小梁模式评估:一项初步研究。

Assessment of trabecular pattern on periapical and panoramic radiographs: a pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Geneva, Rue Barthelemy-Menn 19, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 2010 Mar;68(2):91-7. doi: 10.3109/00016350903468235.

DOI:10.3109/00016350903468235
PMID:20085501
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This methodological study aimed to determine whether the mandibular trabecular bone assessment from panoramic radiographs, using a visual index, corresponds to the evaluation obtained from periapical radiographs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A panoramic radiograph and corresponding periapical radiographs of the region of the lower premolars and molars were collected from each of 32 patients (mean age 18.5 +/- 5.5 years). Two calibrated observers assessed randomly the interdental sites between the first molar and second premolar and between the two premolars on all the radiographs using a visual index. Evaluations were repeated with an interval of 60 days. The results of the repeated evaluations were used to assess intra- and inter-observer agreements, employing Kappa statistics. Spearman's correlation was used to determine the association between assessments of panoramic and periapical radiographs.

RESULTS

In total, 79 interdental sites were evaluated on the panoramic and periapical radiographs. The visual analysis of periapical radiographs revealed intra-observer agreements of 0.88 for observer 1 and 0.93 for observer 2, and an inter-observer agreement of 0.82. The intra-observer agreement for panoramic radiographs was 0.79 and 0.83 for observers 1 and 2, respectively, and the inter-observer agreement was 0.79. A substantial correlation was found between periapical and panoramic radiographs (rho = 0.737, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although panoramic radiographs are less reliable than periapical radiographs, they can be used for assessment of the trabecular bone pattern with the aid of a visual index. Training on the method is recommended to obtain results with a high reproducibility.

摘要

目的

本方法学研究旨在确定使用视觉指数从全景片评估下颌骨小梁骨是否与根尖片获得的评估结果相对应。

材料与方法

从 32 名患者(平均年龄 18.5±5.5 岁)的下颌前磨牙和磨牙区域采集了一张全景片和相应的根尖片。两名经过校准的观察者使用视觉指数随机评估了所有放射片中第一磨牙和第二前磨牙之间以及两个前磨牙之间的牙间部位。评估间隔为 60 天。使用 Kappa 统计评估重复评估的结果来评估观察者内和观察者间的一致性。采用 Spearman 相关分析来确定全景和根尖片评估之间的相关性。

结果

总共在全景和根尖片中评估了 79 个牙间部位。根尖片的视觉分析显示,观察者 1 的观察者内一致性为 0.88,观察者 2 的观察者内一致性为 0.93,观察者间一致性为 0.82。全景片的观察者内一致性分别为观察者 1 的 0.79 和观察者 2 的 0.83,观察者间一致性为 0.79。发现根尖片和全景片之间存在高度相关性(rho=0.737,p=0.001)。

结论

虽然全景片不如根尖片可靠,但可以使用视觉指数来评估小梁骨模式。建议进行方法培训以获得具有高重现性的结果。

相似文献

1
Assessment of trabecular pattern on periapical and panoramic radiographs: a pilot study.根尖片和曲面断层片上的小梁模式评估:一项初步研究。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2010 Mar;68(2):91-7. doi: 10.3109/00016350903468235.
2
Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.基于Scanora全景X线摄影和后牙咬合翼片X线摄影中边缘骨组织可见性的观察者表现。
Stomatologija. 2008;10(1):36-43.
3
A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.咬合翼片、根尖片、未滤波和滤波数字全景图像在后牙邻面龋检测中的诊断准确性比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Dec;37(8):458-63. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/84698143.
4
Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.Scanora全景X线摄影与牙合翼片X线摄影在评估边缘骨组织方面的比较。
Stomatologija. 2006;8(1):9-15.
5
Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.传统咬合翼片X线片与数字化咬合翼片X线片可视化过程中临床医生一致性的比较。
Gen Dent. 2006 May-Jun;54(3):182-5.
6
Observer agreement in the assessment of mandibular trabecular bone pattern from panoramic radiographs.全景X线片评估下颌骨小梁骨形态的观察者一致性
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1997 Mar;26(2):90-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600213.
7
Reliability of marginal bone level measurements on digital panoramic and digital intraoral radiographs.数字全景和数字口腔内放射影像的边缘骨水平测量的可靠性。
Oral Radiol. 2020 Apr;36(2):135-140. doi: 10.1007/s11282-019-00387-0. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
8
Mandibular cortical index evaluation in masked and unmasked panoramic radiographs.在蒙片和未蒙片全景X线片中评估下颌骨皮质指数
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Feb;38(2):86-91. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/56808511.
9
A study to determine the added value of 740 screening panoramic radiographs compared to intraoral radiography in the management of adult (>18 years) dentate patients in a primary care setting.一项旨在确定在初级保健环境中对成年(>18 岁)有牙患者的管理中,740 张筛查全景片相对于口腔内射线照相术的附加价值的研究。
J Dent. 2012 Aug;40(8):661-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
10
Diagnostic agreement of conventional and inverted scanned panoramic radiographs in the detection of the mandibular canal and the mental foramen.传统扫描全景X线片与反转扫描全景X线片在检测下颌管和颏孔方面的诊断一致性。
J Oral Implantol. 2004;30(1):2-6. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2004)030<0002:DAOCAI>2.0.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
A dual approach to third molar complexity: correlating fractal analysis with the pederson difficulty index - non-clinical research article.第三磨牙复杂性的双重研究方法:分形分析与佩德森难度指数的相关性——非临床研究文章
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06520-2.
2
Comparison of periapical radiography, panoramic radiography, and CBCT in the evaluation of trabecular bone structure using fractal analysis.应用分形分析对比根尖片、曲面断层片和 CBCT 评估小梁骨结构。
Oral Radiol. 2024 Jul;40(3):394-400. doi: 10.1007/s11282-024-00743-9. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
3
Analysis of mandible trabecular structure using digital periapical radiographs to assess low bone quality in postmenopausal women.
利用数字化根尖片分析下颌骨小梁结构以评估绝经后女性的低骨质量
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Dec;33(8):997-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
4
Mandibular cortical bone structure as risk indicator in fractured and non-fractured 80-year-old men and women.下颌骨皮质骨结构作为 80 岁男性和女性骨折与非骨折风险的预测指标。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 24;21(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01829-0.
5
Predicting fractures using trabecular patterns on panoramic radiographs.利用全景片上的骨小梁模式预测骨折。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jan;22(1):377-384. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2122-2. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
6
Assessment of the changes in alveolar bone quality after fixed orthodontic therapy: A trabecular structure analysis.固定正畸治疗后牙槽骨质量变化的评估:小梁结构分析
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016 Fall;10(4):201-206. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2016.032. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
7
Alveolar bone loss in osteoporosis: a loaded and cellular affair?骨质疏松症中的牙槽骨丧失:是负荷与细胞相关的问题吗?
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2016 Jul 13;8:95-103. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S92774. eCollection 2016.
8
Cross gender-age trabecular texture analysis in cone beam CT.基于锥形束 CT 的跨性别-年龄小梁骨纹理分析
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(4):20130324. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130324. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
9
Diagnostic imaging of trabecular bone microstructure for oral implants: a literature review.口腔种植体小梁骨结构的影像学诊断:文献综述。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(3):20120075. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120075.
10
Mandibular bone changes in 24 years and skeletal fracture prediction.下颌骨变化 24 年与骨骼骨折预测。
Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17(2):565-72. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0745-x. Epub 2012 May 1.