Schwartz Michael A, Wiggins Osborne P
Department of Psychiatry, University of Hawaii 1106 Blackacre Trail, Austin, Texas, 78746, USA.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2010 Jan 21;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-5-2.
Basing ourselves on the writings of Hans Jonas, we offer to psychosomatic medicine a philosophy of life that surmounts the mind-body dualism which has plagued Western thought since the origins of modern science in seventeenth century Europe. Any present-day account of reality must draw upon everything we know about the living and the non-living. Since we are living beings ourselves, we know what it means to be alive from our own first-hand experience. Therefore, our philosophy of life, in addition to starting with what empirical science tells us about inorganic and organic reality, must also begin from our own direct experience of life in ourselves and in others; it can then show how the two meet in the living being. Since life is ultimately one reality, our theory must reintegrate psyche with soma such that no component of the whole is short-changed, neither the objective nor the subjective. In this essay, we lay out the foundational components of such a theory by clarifying the defining features of living beings as polarities. We describe three such polarities: 1) Being vs. non-being: Always threatened by non-being, the organism must constantly re-assert its being through its own activity. 2) World-relatedness vs. self-enclosure: Living beings are both enclosed with themselves, defined by the boundaries that separate them from their environment, while they are also ceaselessly reaching out to their environment and engaging in transactions with it. 3) Dependence vs. independence: Living beings are both dependent on the material components that constitute them at any given moment and independent of any particular groupings of these components over time.We then discuss important features of the polarities of life: Metabolism; organic structure; enclosure by a semi-permeable membrane; distinction between "self" and "other"; autonomy; neediness; teleology; sensitivity; values. Moral needs and values already arise at the most basic levels of life, even if only human beings can recognize such values as moral requirements and develop responses to them.
基于汉斯· Jonas 的著作,我们为身心医学提供一种生命哲学,它超越了自 17 世纪欧洲现代科学起源以来一直困扰西方思想的身心二元论。当今任何关于现实的描述都必须借鉴我们所知道的关于生物和非生物的一切。由于我们自身就是生物,我们从自己的第一手经验中知道活着意味着什么。因此,我们的生命哲学,除了从实证科学告诉我们的关于无机和有机现实的内容开始之外,还必须从我们自身以及他人生命的直接经验开始;然后它可以展示这两者在生物中是如何相遇的。由于生命最终是一个统一的现实,我们的理论必须将心理与身体重新整合,以使整体的任何组成部分都不会被忽视,无论是客观的还是主观的。在本文中,我们通过阐明生物作为极性的定义特征来阐述这样一种理论的基础组成部分。我们描述了三种这样的极性:1)存在与非存在:生物体总是受到非存在的威胁,必须通过自身的活动不断重新确认其存在。2)与世界的相关性与自我封闭:生物既自我封闭,由将它们与环境分隔开来的边界所定义,同时它们也不断地向其环境延伸并与之进行互动。3)依赖性与独立性:生物在任何给定时刻都依赖于构成它们的物质成分,同时随着时间的推移又独立于这些成分的任何特定组合。然后我们讨论生命极性的重要特征:新陈代谢;有机结构;由半透膜包围;“自我”与“他者”的区分;自主性;需求;目的论;敏感性;价值观。道德需求和价值观甚至在生命的最基本层面就已经出现,即使只有人类能够将这样的价值观视为道德要求并对其做出反应。