Shepperd Sasha, McClaran Jacqueline, Phillips Christopher O, Lannin Natasha A, Clemson Lindy M, McCluskey Annie, Cameron Ian D, Barras Sarah L
Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Rosemary Rue Building, Headington, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, OX3 7LF.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD000313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000313.pub3.
Discharge planning is a routine feature of health systems in many countries. The aim of discharge planning is to reduce hospital length of stay and unplanned readmission to hospital, and improve the co-ordination of services following discharge from hospital.
To determine the effectiveness of planning the discharge of patients moving from hospital.
We updated the review using the Cochrane EPOC Group Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Social Science Citation Index (last searched in March 2009).
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared an individualised discharge plan with routine discharge care that was not tailored to the individual patient. Participants were hospital inpatients.
Two authors independently undertook data analysis and quality assessment using a predesigned data extraction sheet. Studies are grouped according to patient group (elderly medical patients, surgical patients and those with a mix of conditions) and by outcome.
Twenty-one RCTs (7234 patients) are included; ten of these were identified in this update. Fourteen trials recruited patients with a medical condition (4509 patients), four recruited patients with a mix of medical and surgical conditions (2225 patients), one recruited patients from a psychiatric hospital (343 patients), one from both a psychiatric hospital and from a general hospital (97 patients), and the final trial recruited patients admitted to hospital following a fall (60 patients). Hospital length of stay and readmissions to hospital were significantly reduced for patients allocated to discharge planning (mean difference length of stay -0.91, 95% CI -1.55 to -0.27, 10 trials; readmission rates RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.97, 11 trials). For elderly patients with a medical condition (usually heart failure) there was insufficient evidence for a difference in mortality (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.46, four trials) or being discharged from hospital to home (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.14, two trials). This was also the case for trials recruiting patients recovering from surgery and a mix of medical and surgical conditions. In three trials patients allocated to discharge planning reported increased satisfaction. There was little evidence on overall healthcare costs.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that a structured discharge plan tailored to the individual patient probably brings about small reductions in hospital length of stay and readmission rates for older people admitted to hospital with a medical condition. The impact of discharge planning on mortality, health outcomes and cost remains uncertain.
出院计划是许多国家卫生系统的常规特色。出院计划的目的是缩短住院时间、减少非计划再次入院,并改善出院后服务的协调。
确定为从医院转出的患者制定出院计划的有效性。
我们使用Cochrane有效实践和组织护理小组试验注册库、医学期刊数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库和社会科学引文索引(最后检索时间为2009年3月)对本综述进行了更新。
比较个性化出院计划与未针对个体患者量身定制的常规出院护理的随机对照试验(RCT)。参与者为住院患者。
两位作者使用预先设计的数据提取表独立进行数据分析和质量评估。研究根据患者群体(老年内科患者、外科患者以及患有多种疾病的患者)和结局进行分组。
纳入21项随机对照试验(7234例患者);其中10项是本次更新中确定的。14项试验招募了内科疾病患者(4509例),4项招募了内科和外科疾病混合患者(2225例),1项招募了精神病医院患者(343例),1项招募了精神病医院和综合医院患者(97例),最后1项试验招募了跌倒后入院的患者(60例)。分配到出院计划组的患者住院时间和再次入院率显著降低(住院时间平均差-0.91,95%可信区间-1.55至-0.27,10项试验;再次入院率RR 0.85,95%可信区间0.74至0.97,11项试验)。对于患有内科疾病(通常为心力衰竭)的老年患者,在死亡率(RR 1.04,95%可信区间0.74至1.46,4项试验)或出院回家(RR 1.03,95%可信区间0.93至1.14,2项试验)方面没有足够证据表明存在差异。招募外科术后康复患者以及内科和外科疾病混合患者的试验情况也是如此。在3项试验中,分配到出院计划组的患者报告满意度有所提高。关于总体医疗费用的证据很少。
证据表明,为住院的内科疾病老年患者量身定制的结构化出院计划可能会使住院时间和再次入院率略有降低。出院计划对死亡率、健康结局和成本的影响仍不确定。