Crawford Fay, Thomson Colin E
Division of Community Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, 20 West Richmond Street, Edinburgh, UK, EH8 9DX.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD000416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000416.pub2.
Ten percent of people may experience pain under the heel (plantar heel pain) at some time. Injections, insoles, heel pads, strapping and surgery have been common forms of treatment offered. The absolute and relative effectiveness of these interventions are poorly understood.
The objective of this review was to identify and evaluate the evidence for effectiveness of treatments for plantar heel pain.
We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group specialised register (September 2002), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2002), EMBASE (1988 to September 2002) and reference lists of articles and dissertations. Four podiatry journals were handsearched to 1998. We contacted all UK schools of podiatry to identify dissertations on the management of heel pain, and investigators in the field to identify unpublished data or research in progress. No language restrictions were applied.
Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of interventions for plantar heel pain in adults.
Two reviewers independently evaluated randomised controlled trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed trial quality. Additional information was obtained by direct contact with investigators. No poolable data were identified. Where measures of variance were available we have calculated the weighted mean differences based on visual analogue scale (VAS) scores.
Nineteen randomised trials involving 1626 participants were included. Trial quality was generally poor, and pooling of data was not conducted. All trials measured heel pain as the primary outcome. Seven trials evaluated interventions against placebo/dummy or no treatment. There was limited evidence for the effectiveness of topical corticosteroid administered by iontophoresis, i.e. using an electric current, in reducing pain. There was some evidence for the effectiveness of injected corticosteroid providing temporary relief of pain. There was conflicting evidence for the effectiveness of low energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy in reducing night pain, resting pain and pressure pain in the short term (6 and 12 weeks) and therefore its effectiveness remains equivocal. In individuals with chronic pain (longer than six months), there was limited evidence for the effectiveness of dorsiflexion night splints in reducing pain. There was no evidence to support the effectiveness of therapeutic ultrasound, low-intensity laser therapy, exposure to an electron generating device or insoles with magnetic foil. No randomised trials evaluating surgery, or radiotherapy against a randomly allocated control population were identified. There was limited evidence for the superiority of corticosteroid injections over orthotic devices.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although there is limited evidence for the effectiveness of local corticosteroid therapy, the effectiveness of other frequently employed treatments in altering the clinical course of plantar heel pain has not been established in randomised controlled trials.At the moment there is limited evidence upon which to base clinical practice. Treatments that are used to reduce heel pain seem to bring only marginal gains over no treatment and control therapies such as stretching exercises. Steroid injections are a popular method of treating the condition but only seem to be useful in the short term and only to a small degree. Orthoses should be cautiously prescribed for those patients who stand for long periods; there is limited evidence that stretching exercises and heel pads are associated with better outcomes than custom made orthoses in people who stand for more than eight hours per day.Well designed and conducted randomised trials are required.
10%的人在某些时候可能会经历足跟下疼痛(足底足跟痛)。注射、鞋垫、足跟垫、绑扎和手术一直是常用的治疗方式。这些干预措施的绝对和相对有效性尚不清楚。
本综述的目的是识别和评估治疗足底足跟痛有效性的证据。
我们检索了Cochrane骨、关节和肌肉创伤组专门注册库(2002年9月)、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(Cochrane图书馆2002年第3期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2002年9月)、EMBASE(1988年至2002年9月)以及文章和论文的参考文献列表。对4种足病学杂志进行了手工检索至1998年。我们联系了英国所有足病学学校以识别关于足跟痛管理的论文,并联系该领域的研究人员以识别未发表的数据或正在进行的研究。未设语言限制。
针对成人足底足跟痛干预措施的随机和半随机试验。
两名综述作者独立评估随机对照试验以确定是否纳入,提取数据并评估试验质量。通过直接与研究人员联系获取额外信息。未识别出可合并的数据。在有方差测量值的情况下,我们基于视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分计算了加权平均差。
纳入了19项涉及1626名参与者的随机试验。试验质量总体较差,未进行数据合并。所有试验均将足跟痛作为主要结局进行测量。7项试验评估了干预措施与安慰剂/假治疗或不治疗的对比。有有限证据表明通过离子电渗疗法(即利用电流)给予局部皮质类固醇在减轻疼痛方面有效。有一些证据表明注射皮质类固醇能暂时缓解疼痛。关于低能量体外冲击波疗法在短期内(6周和12周)减轻夜间疼痛、静息痛和压痛的有效性存在相互矛盾的证据,因此其有效性仍不明确。在慢性疼痛(超过6个月)的个体中,有有限证据表明背屈夜间夹板在减轻疼痛方面有效。没有证据支持治疗性超声、低强度激光疗法、暴露于电子发生装置或带有磁性箔的鞋垫的有效性。未识别出评估手术或放疗与随机分配的对照人群对比的随机试验。有有限证据表明皮质类固醇注射优于矫形器械。
尽管局部皮质类固醇疗法有效性的证据有限,但其他常用治疗方法在改变足底足跟痛临床病程方面的有效性在随机对照试验中尚未得到证实。目前临床实践的依据有限。用于减轻足跟痛的治疗方法与不治疗及诸如伸展运动等对照疗法相比,似乎仅带来微小益处。类固醇注射是治疗该病的常用方法,但似乎仅在短期内且仅在小程度上有用。对于长时间站立的患者,应谨慎开具矫形器处方;有有限证据表明,对于每天站立超过8小时的人,伸展运动和足跟垫比定制矫形器的效果更好。需要设计良好且实施得当的随机试验。