Suppr超能文献

改善背痛工人工作成果的体能训练计划。

Physical conditioning programs for improving work outcomes in workers with back pain.

作者信息

Schaafsma Frederieke, Schonstein Eva, Whelan Karyn M, Ulvestad Eirik, Kenny Dianna Theadora, Verbeek Jos H

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Cumberland Campus, PO Box 170, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia, 1825.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD001822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001822.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical conditioning programs aim to improve work status for workers on sick leave. This is an update of a Cochrane Review (Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for workers with back and neck pain) first published in 2003.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of physical conditioning programs in reducing time lost from work for workers with back pain.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following databases to June/July 2008: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2008, issue 3), MEDLINE from 1966, EMBASE from 1980, CINAHL from 1982, PsycINFO from 1967, and PEDro.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs that studied workers with work disability related to back pain and who were included in physical conditioning programs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-seven references, reporting on 23 RCTs (3676 workers) were included, 13 of which had a low risk of bias. In 14 studies, physical conditioning programs were compared to usual care. In workers with acute back pain, there was no effect on sickness absence. For workers with subacute back pain, we found conflicting results, but subgroup analysis showed a positive effect of interventions with workplace involvement. In workers with chronic back pain, pooled results of five studies showed a small effect on sickness absence at long-term follow-up (SMD: -0.18 (95% CI: -0.37 to 0.00)). In workers with chronic back pain, physical conditioning programs were compared to other exercise therapy in six studies, with conflicting results. The addition of cognitive behavioural therapy to physical conditioning programs was not more effective than the physical conditioning alone.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of physical conditioning programs in reducing sick leave when compared to usual care or than other exercises in workers with back pain remains uncertain. In workers with acute back pain, these programs probably have no effect on sick leave, but there may be a positive effect on sick leave for workers with subacute and chronic back pain. Workplace involvement might improve the outcome. Better understanding of the mechanism behind physical conditioning programs and return-to-work is needed to be able to develop more effective interventions.

摘要

背景

身体调节计划旨在改善病假员工的工作状态。这是Cochrane系统评价(针对背痛和颈痛工人的工作调节、工作强化和功能恢复)的更新版,该评价首次发表于2003年。

目的

比较身体调节计划对减少背痛工人工作时间损失的有效性。

检索策略

我们检索了以下数据库至2008年6月/7月:Cochrane系统评价数据库(Cochrane Library 2008年第3期)、1966年起的MEDLINE、1980年起的EMBASE、1982年起的CINAHL、1967年起的PsycINFO以及PEDro。

选择标准

研究与背痛相关的工作残疾工人且纳入身体调节计划的随机对照试验(RCT)和整群随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立提取数据并评估偏倚风险。

主要结果

纳入了37篇参考文献,报告了23项RCT(3676名工人),其中13项偏倚风险较低。在14项研究中,将身体调节计划与常规护理进行了比较。对于急性背痛工人,对病假缺勤无影响。对于亚急性背痛工人,我们发现结果相互矛盾,但亚组分析显示工作场所参与的干预措施有积极效果。对于慢性背痛工人,五项研究的汇总结果显示在长期随访中对病假缺勤有较小影响(标准化均数差:-0.18(95%可信区间:-0.37至0.00))。在六项研究中,将身体调节计划与其他运动疗法对慢性背痛工人进行了比较,结果相互矛盾。在身体调节计划中添加认知行为疗法并不比单纯的身体调节更有效。

作者结论

与常规护理或其他运动相比,身体调节计划在减少背痛工人病假方面的有效性仍不确定。对于急性背痛工人,这些计划可能对病假缺勤没有影响,但对于亚急性和慢性背痛工人可能对病假缺勤有积极影响。工作场所参与可能会改善结果。需要更好地理解身体调节计划和重返工作背后的机制,以便能够开发更有效的干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验