Suppr超能文献

利巴韦林联合干扰素与单用干扰素治疗慢性丙型肝炎的比较

Ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for chronic hepatitis C.

作者信息

Brok Jesper, Gluud Lise Lotte, Gluud Christian

机构信息

Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 3344, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark, DK-2100.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD005445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005445.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Standard therapy is ribavirin plus pegylated interferon to achieve undetectable level of virus in the blood, but the effect on clinical outcomes is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ribavirin and interferon combination therapy versus interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, approaching authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies until March 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials, irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status, comparing ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were serum sustained loss of hepatitis C virus, liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality, and adverse events. We performed subgroup analyses of patients who were naive, relapsers, or non-responders to previous antiviral treatment. All outcomes were analysed with the random-effects model. We used Peto odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for analysis of morbidity plus mortality. The remaining outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR). We used trial sequential analyses to examine the robustness of our findings.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 83 randomised trials with 12,707 patients. Most trials had unclear or high risk of bias. We did not find any significant influence of bias on our results but cannot exclude outcome measure reporting bias as many trials did not report on the primary outcomes of this review. Compared with interferon, ribavirin plus interferon had a significant beneficial effect on sustained virological response in subgroups of naive patients (RR 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 0.75), relapsers (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.70), non-responders (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.93), and in all patients (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.79). Combination therapy significantly reduced morbidity plus mortality in all patients (Peto OR, 0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.79), but not in naive, relapsers, or non-responders individually. Combination therapy significantly increased the risk of haematological, dermatological, gastrointestinal, infectious, and miscellaneous (cough, dyspnoea, fatigue) adverse reactions. Accordingly, combination therapy significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation and dose reductions. Trial sequential analyses confirmed our findings regarding virological effects, but not regarding liver-related morbidity and all-cause mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared with interferon alone, ribavirin plus interferon is more effective in clearing hepatitis C virus from the blood. Combination therapy may reduce liver-related morbidity and all-cause mortality, but we need more evidence. The number needed to treat to obtain a beneficial effect is considerable considering the increased risk of several severe adverse reactions and costs.

摘要

背景

丙型肝炎是导致肝脏相关发病和死亡的主要原因。标准治疗方法是利巴韦林联合聚乙二醇干扰素,以使血液中的病毒水平检测不到,但对临床结局的影响存在争议。

目的

评估利巴韦林与干扰素联合治疗对比干扰素单药治疗慢性丙型肝炎的有益和有害效果。

检索策略

我们通过电子数据库、手动检索参考文献和期刊、联系试验作者以及制药公司来识别试验,检索截至2009年3月。

选择标准

我们纳入了随机试验,无论是否采用盲法、语言或发表状态,比较利巴韦林联合干扰素与干扰素治疗慢性丙型肝炎的效果。

数据收集与分析

主要结局指标为丙型肝炎病毒血清持续清除、肝脏相关发病加上全因死亡率以及不良事件。我们对初治患者、复发患者或既往抗病毒治疗无应答者进行了亚组分析。所有结局均采用随机效应模型进行分析。我们使用Peto比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)分析发病和死亡率。其余结局以相对风险(RR)呈现。我们采用试验序贯分析来检验研究结果的稳健性。

主要结果

我们纳入了83项随机试验,共12707例患者。大多数试验的偏倚风险不明确或较高。我们未发现偏倚对结果有任何显著影响,但由于许多试验未报告本综述的主要结局,不能排除结局测量报告偏倚。与干扰素相比,利巴韦林联合干扰素在初治患者亚组(RR 0.72,95%置信区间(CI)0.68至0.75)、复发患者亚组(RR 0.62,95% CI 0.54至0.70)、无应答者亚组(RR 0.89,95% CI 0.84至0.93)以及所有患者亚组(RR 0.75,95% CI 0.71至0.79)中对持续病毒学应答有显著有益效果。联合治疗在所有患者中显著降低了发病和死亡率(Peto OR,0.43,95% CI 0.23至0.79),但在初治患者、复发患者或无应答者个体中未降低。联合治疗显著增加了血液学、皮肤病学、胃肠道、感染性及其他(咳嗽、呼吸困难、疲劳)不良反应的风险。因此,联合治疗显著增加了治疗中断和剂量减少的风险。试验序贯分析证实了我们关于病毒学效应的研究结果,但未证实关于肝脏相关发病和全因死亡率的结果。

作者结论

与单独使用干扰素相比,利巴韦林联合干扰素在从血液中清除丙型肝炎病毒方面更有效。联合治疗可能降低肝脏相关发病和全因死亡率,但我们需要更多证据。考虑到几种严重不良反应风险增加和成本,获得有益效果所需的治疗人数相当可观。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验