Singh Jasvinder A, Noorbaloochi Shahrzad, Singh Gurkirpal
Medicine, Minneapolis VA Medical Center, 1 Veterans Drive, Rheumatology (111R), Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 55417.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD008341. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008341.
Golimumab is a humanized inhibitor of Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of Rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
The objective of this systematic review was to compare the efficacy and safety of golimumab (alone or in combination with DMARDs or biologics) to placebo (alone or in combination with DMARDs or biologics) in randomized or quasi-randomized clinical trials in adults with RA.
An expert librarian searched six databases for any clinical trials of golimumab in RA, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), OVID MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Science Citation Index (Web of Science) and Current Controlled Trials databases.
Studies were included if they used golimumab in adults with RA, were randomized or quasi-randomized and provided clinical outcomes.
Two review authors (JS, SN) independently reviewed all titles and abstracts, selected appropriate studies for full review and reviewed the full-text articles for the final selection of included studies. For each study, they independently abstracted study characteristics, safety and efficacy data and performed risk of bias assessment. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. For continuous measures, we calculated mean differences or standardized mean differences and for categorical measures, relative risks. 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Four RCTs with 1,231 patients treated with golimumab and 483 patients treated with placebo were included. Of these, 436 were treated with the FDA-approved dose of golimumab 50 mg every four weeks. Compared to patients treated with placebo+methotrexate, patients treated with the FDA-approved dose of golimumab+methotrexate were 2.6 times more likely to reach ACR50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 4.9; P=0.005 and NNT= 5, 95% confidence interval 2 to 20), no more likely to have any adverse event (relative risk 1.1, 95% Cl 0.9 to 1.2; P=0.44), and 0.5 times as likely to have overall withdrawals (95% Cl 0.3 to 0.8; P=0.005). Golimumab-treated patients were significantly more likely to achieve remission, low disease activity and improvement in functional ability compared to placebo (all statistically significant). No significant differences were noted between golimumab and placebo regarding serious adverse events, infections, serious infections, lung infections, tuberculosis, cancer, withdrawals due to adverse events and inefficacy and deaths. No radiographic data were reported.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: With an overall high grade of evidence, at the FDA-approved dose, golimumab is significantly more efficacious than placebo in treatment of patients with active RA , when used in combination with methotrexate. The short-term safety profile, based on short-term RCTs, is reasonable with no differences in total adverse events, serious infections, cancer, tuberculosis or deaths. Long-term surveillance studies are needed for safety assessment.
戈利木单抗是一种肿瘤坏死因子-α人源化抑制剂,最近已获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)。
本系统评价的目的是在成人类风湿关节炎的随机或半随机临床试验中,比较戈利木单抗(单独使用或与改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)或生物制剂联合使用)与安慰剂(单独使用或与DMARDs或生物制剂联合使用)的疗效和安全性。
一位专业图书馆员检索了六个数据库,以查找戈利木单抗治疗类风湿关节炎的任何临床试验,包括Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、OVID MEDLINE、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、科学引文索引(科学网)和当前对照试验数据库。
纳入的研究需满足在成人类风湿关节炎患者中使用戈利木单抗、为随机或半随机试验并提供临床结局。
两位综述作者(JS,SN)独立审查所有标题和摘要,选择合适的研究进行全文审查,并审查全文文章以最终选定纳入研究。对于每项研究,他们独立提取研究特征、安全性和疗效数据,并进行偏倚风险评估。分歧通过协商解决。对于连续性指标,我们计算平均差或标准化平均差;对于分类指标,计算相对风险。计算95%置信区间。
纳入了四项随机对照试验,其中1231例患者接受戈利木单抗治疗,483例患者接受安慰剂治疗。其中,436例患者接受FDA批准剂量的戈利木单抗,每四周50mg。与接受安慰剂+甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者相比,接受FDA批准剂量的戈利木单抗+甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者达到美国风湿病学会50%改善标准(ACR50)的可能性高2.6倍(95%置信区间(CI)1.3至4.9;P=0.005,需治疗人数(NNT)=5,95%置信区间2至20),发生任何不良事件的可能性无差异(相对风险1.1,95%CI 0.9至1.2;P=0.44),总体退出试验的可能性为其0.5倍(95%CI 0.3至0.8;P=0.005)。与安慰剂相比,接受戈利木单抗治疗的患者实现缓解、低疾病活动度和功能能力改善的可能性显著更高(均具有统计学意义)。在严重不良事件、感染、严重感染、肺部感染、结核病、癌症、因不良事件和无效导致的退出试验以及死亡方面,戈利木单抗与安慰剂之间未观察到显著差异。未报告影像学数据。
基于总体高级别的证据,在FDA批准的剂量下,戈利木单抗与甲氨蝶呤联合使用时,在治疗活动性类风湿关节炎患者方面比安慰剂显著更有效。基于短期随机对照试验的短期安全性概况是合理的,在总不良事件、严重感染、癌症、结核病或死亡方面无差异。需要进行长期监测研究以评估安全性。