Department of Cognitive Neurology, Functional Anatomy of the Frontal Lobes, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Dec;30(12):2407-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.07030.x. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
Processing perceptual sequences relies on the motor system, which is able to simulate the dynamics of the environment by developing internal representations of external events and using them to predict the incoming stimuli. Although it has previously been demonstrated that such models may incorporate predictions based on exact stimulus properties and single stimulus dimensions, it is not known whether they can also support abstract predictions pertaining to the level of stimulus categories. This issue was investigated within the present event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study, which compared the processing of perceptual sequences of different specificity, namely those in which the sequential structure was based on the order of presentation of individual stimuli (token), and those in which such structure was defined by stimulus categories (type). The results obtained indicate a comparable engagement of the basic premotor-parietal network in processing both specific and categorical perceptual sequences. However, type sequences additionally elicited activations within the lateral prefrontal, occipital and posterior temporal regions that supported categorization in this task context. Introducing sequential deviants into token sequences activated parietotemporal and ventrolateral frontal cortices, whereas a less pronounced overall response, dominated by lateral prefrontal activation, was elicited by violations introduced into type sequences. Overall, the findings obtained suggest that, although forward models in perception may be able to incorporate expectations of lower specificity when compared to the motor domain, such processing is crucially dependent on additional contributions from lateral prefrontal as well as inferior occipital and temporal cortices that support categorization occurring in such a dynamic context.
处理知觉序列依赖于运动系统,该系统能够通过对外界事件的内部表示来模拟环境动态,并使用这些表示来预测传入的刺激。尽管先前已经证明,此类模型可以基于刺激的精确属性和单一刺激维度来纳入预测,但尚不清楚它们是否也可以支持与刺激类别水平相关的抽象预测。本事件相关功能磁共振成像研究探讨了这一问题,该研究比较了不同特异性的知觉序列的处理,即基于单个刺激呈现顺序的序列结构(记号)的序列和基于刺激类别的序列结构(类型)的序列。研究结果表明,在处理特定和类别知觉序列时,基本前运动-顶叶网络的参与程度相当。然而,类型序列还在外侧前额叶、枕叶和颞叶后区引发了激活,支持了该任务背景下的分类。在记号序列中引入序列偏差会激活顶颞叶皮质和腹外侧额叶皮质,而在类型序列中引入偏差则会引发相对不那么明显的整体反应,主要由外侧前额叶激活引起。总的来说,研究结果表明,尽管知觉中的前向模型在与运动领域相比时可能能够纳入较低特异性的期望,但这种处理过程严重依赖于外侧前额叶以及支持此类动态背景下分类的下枕叶和颞叶皮质的额外贡献。