Suppr超能文献

胆道在活体潜在肝供者中的显示:3.0T 与 1.5T 磁共振胆系成像的同体对照研究。

Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: intraindividual comparison of MR cholangiography at 3.0 and 1.5 T.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1, Pungnap2-dong, Songpa-ku, Seoul 138-736, Korea.

出版信息

Radiology. 2010 Feb;254(2):469-78. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09090003.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To intraindividually compare the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography at 3.0 and 1.5 T for depicting biliary anatomy with intraoperative cholangiography as the reference standard and to compare the image quality for biliary tract visualization at these two field strengths.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After obtaining institutional review board approval and informed consent, 52 living potential liver donors underwent MR cholangiography at both 1.5 and 3.0 T. The protocol included projectional single-section rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) and respiratory-triggered three-dimensional (3D) fast spin-echo (SE) T2-weighted sequences. Two readers independently analyzed images, scoring the visualization of all first- and second-order biliary branches on a four-point scale and determining the number of visible third-order branches.

RESULTS

MR cholangiography at 3.0 T correctly depicted biliary anatomy in 90.4% of subjects on combined analysis of both sequences by both readers, in 88.5% with projectional RARE images for both readers, and in 84.6% and 88.5% with 3D fast SE images for readers 1 and 2, respectively. MR cholangiography at 1.5 T showed 86.5% and 84.6% accuracy on combined analysis for readers 1 and 2, respectively; 78.8% and 75.0% accuracy on projectional RARE images for readers 1 and 2, respectively; and 84.6% and 86.5% accuracy with 3D fast SE images for readers 1 and 2, respectively. With the projectional RARE sequence, 3.0-T MR cholangiography demonstrated significantly higher mean visualization scores for second-order branches (reader 1: 2.29 vs 1.78, P = .01; reader 2: 2.52 vs 2.10, P < .01) and mean numbers of visible third-order branches (reader 1: 5.53 vs 4.21, P < .01; reader 2: 5.91 vs 3.74, P < .01) than did 1.5-T MR cholangiography.

CONCLUSION

Compared with 1.5-T MR cholangiography, 3.0-T MR cholangiography did not significantly increase accuracy for identification of biliary anatomy. Projectional RARE images at 3.0 T enabled better visualization of second- and third-order branches than did those at 1.5 T.

摘要

目的

通过与术中胆道造影术(金标准)进行个体内比较,评估 3.0T 和 1.5T 磁共振胆系造影术(MRCP)在胆道解剖成像中的准确性,并比较这两种场强下胆道可视化的图像质量。

材料与方法

在获得机构审查委员会批准和知情同意后,52 名潜在活体肝供者分别在 1.5T 和 3.0T 行 MRCP 检查。该方案包括投影单节段快速获取弛豫增强(RARE)和呼吸触发三维(3D)快速自旋回波(SE)T2 加权序列。两名读者分别独立分析图像,对所有一级和二级胆管分支的显示情况进行四分制评分,并确定可见三级分支的数量。

结果

两名读者分别结合两种序列的分析结果显示,3.0T MRCP 正确显示胆道解剖结构的比例为 90.4%;两名读者的投影 RARE 图像分别为 88.5%;读者 1 和 2 的 3D 快速 SE 图像分别为 84.6%和 88.5%。1.5T MRCP 联合分析时,读者 1 和 2 的准确率分别为 86.5%和 84.6%;读者 1 和 2 的投影 RARE 图像分别为 78.8%和 75.0%;读者 1 和 2 的 3D 快速 SE 图像分别为 84.6%和 86.5%。与投影 RARE 序列相比,3.0T MRCP 显示二级胆管的平均可视评分显著升高(读者 1:2.29 比 1.78,P=0.01;读者 2:2.52 比 2.10,P<.01),可见三级胆管的平均数量也显著增加(读者 1:5.53 比 4.21,P<.01;读者 2:5.91 比 3.74,P<.01)。

结论

与 1.5T MRCP 相比,3.0T MRCP 并未显著提高胆道解剖结构的识别准确性。与 1.5T 相比,3.0T 的投影 RARE 图像能更好地显示二级和三级胆管。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验