Department of Food Science and Technology, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156, Iran.
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2010 Mar;61(2):226-43. doi: 10.3109/09637480903373328.
The objective of this study was to compare the nutritional values of camel semitendinosus muscles with those of calves. Then, sausages were made from camel meat, beef and equal proportions of each and stored at 4 degrees C for 45 days. The composition, physicochemical characteristics, sensory properties, and microstructure of the samples were evaluated. The proximate composition of meat from the two species was significantly different. Beef contained a significantly higher amount of vitamin E, whereas camel meat had better profile of fatty acid and higher iron content. Camel meat had a higher pH but similar myofibrillar protein content as beef. Sausages made from 100% camel meat also had higher pH and cooking yield along with higher a* (redness) and lower L* (lightness) than the others. 2-Thiobarbitoric acid values among these treatments were significantly different. Samples containing 50% of each meat had a higher resistance to shear force; however, panelists could not detect any significant difference in tenderness of the samples.
本研究旨在比较骆驼半腱肌与小牛的营养价值。然后,用骆驼肉、牛肉和两者等比例混合制作香肠,并在 4 摄氏度下储存 45 天。评估了样品的成分、理化特性、感官特性和微观结构。两种肉的常规成分有显著差异。牛肉中维生素 E 含量显著较高,而骆驼肉具有更好的脂肪酸分布和更高的铁含量。骆驼肉的 pH 值较高,但肌原纤维蛋白含量与牛肉相似。100%骆驼肉制成的香肠的 pH 值和蒸煮产率也较高,a*(红色)较高,L*(亮度)较低。这些处理之间的 2-硫代巴比妥酸值有显著差异。含 50%每种肉的样品具有更高的抗剪切力;然而,品尝者无法检测到样品嫩度的任何显著差异。