Suppr超能文献

单日内 GemOx 方案治疗胰胆肿瘤患者的安全性和疗效:单机构经验。

Safety and efficacy of single-day GemOx regimen in patients with pancreatobiliary cancer: a single institution experience.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

出版信息

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2010 Mar;9(2):207-13. doi: 10.1517/14740330903555181.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

GemOx (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) > 100 min on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 2 every 2 weeks) achieved a response rate of 26.8%, improved progression-free survival (PFS) but failed to demonstrate a benefit in overall survival (OS) compared with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer. This regimen has regained attention after recent pooled- and meta-analysis suggested a survival benefit of gemcitabine-platinum doublets over gemcitabine. However, GemOx is associated with inconvenience to patients, early cumulative dose developing neuropathy and thrombocytopenia. In addition, fixed dose rate of gemcitabine showed no benefit > 30 min infusion schedule in the ECOG6201 study. Pharmacokinetic profiles of both drugs did not show statistically significant difference regardless of the order of administration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In order to create a more convenient and equally effective regimen, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-day modified GemOx (S-GemOx, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) > 30 min and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) > 2 h on day 1 every 2 weeks) in patients with pancreatic and biliary cancers.

RESULTS

In all, 34 patients (median age 60 years, male/female: 17/17) received S-GemOx including locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (26) and biliary duct carcinoma (8). Median treatment was six cycles with duration of 12 weeks (range (r): 2 - 56). Median cumulative dose of oxaliplatin was 517.5 mg/m(2) (r: 85 - 2380). A total of 27 of 34 patients were evaluated for efficacy after initial staging: 1 (3.7%) complete response (CR), 4 (14.8%) partial response (PR), 18 (66.7%) stable disease and 4 (14.8%) progression of disease. Overall response rate (CR + PR) was 18.5%. Median PFS and OS were 7 and 11.6 months, respectively. All patients were assessed for toxicities. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities include anemia (8%), neutropenia (11%), thrombocytopenia (5%), nausea/vomiting (3%), diarrhea (3%), hypersensitivity reaction (14%) and neuropathy (3%). No deaths occurred due to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

S-GemOx regimen provides convenient schedule, toxicities appear to be comparable with GemOx. The incidence of neuropathy (3 vs 19.1%) and thrombocytopenia (5 vs 14%) are substantially lower compared with GemOx. Prospective studies of S-GemOx in a large patient population are warranted.

摘要

背景

GemOx(吉西他滨 1000mg/m2>100 分钟,第 1 天,奥沙利铂 100mg/m2,第 2 天,每 2 周 1 次)在胰腺癌中与吉西他滨相比,实现了 26.8%的缓解率,改善了无进展生存期(PFS),但未能显示总生存期(OS)的获益。最近的汇总和荟萃分析表明,吉西他滨-铂类双联方案比吉西他滨有生存获益,此后该方案再次受到关注。然而,GemOx 给患者带来不便,早期累积剂量会导致周围神经病变和血小板减少。此外,ECOG6201 研究表明,吉西他滨固定剂量率输注超过 30 分钟方案没有获益。无论给药顺序如何,两种药物的药代动力学特征均无统计学差异。

患者和方法

为了创造一种更方便且同样有效的方案,我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估单天改良 GemOx(S-GemOx,吉西他滨 1000mg/m2>30 分钟,奥沙利铂 85mg/m2>2 小时,第 1 天,每 2 周 1 次)在胰腺癌和胆管癌患者中的疗效和安全性。

结果

共有 34 名患者(中位年龄 60 岁,男/女:17/17)接受了 S-GemOx 治疗,包括局部晚期或转移性胰腺癌(26 例)和胆管癌(8 例)。中位治疗时间为 6 个周期,持续 12 周(范围(r):2-56)。奥沙利铂的中位累积剂量为 517.5mg/m2(r:85-2380)。34 名患者中有 27 名在初始分期后评估疗效:1 例(3.7%)完全缓解(CR),4 例(14.8%)部分缓解(PR),18 例(66.7%)疾病稳定,4 例(14.8%)疾病进展。总缓解率(CR+PR)为 18.5%。中位 PFS 和 OS 分别为 7 个月和 11.6 个月。所有患者均进行了毒性评估。3/4 级血液学毒性包括贫血(8%)、中性粒细胞减少症(11%)、血小板减少症(5%)、恶心/呕吐(3%)、腹泻(3%)、过敏反应(14%)和周围神经病变(3%)。无因治疗而死亡的病例。

结论

S-GemOx 方案提供了方便的治疗方案,毒性似乎与 GemOx 相当。周围神经病变(3%比 19.1%)和血小板减少症(5%比 14%)的发生率明显降低。需要在更大的患者人群中进行 S-GemOx 的前瞻性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验