Université catholique de Bukavu, Congo, RDC.
Diabetes Metab. 2010 Apr;36(2):108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2009.08.001. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
Cassava, a major carbohydrate source in Africa, contains potentially diabetogenic chemicals, although its consumption is not associated with incident diabetes. As it is not known whether cassava intake impairs residual beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), our study compared the metabolic phenotypes of diet- and/or oral antidiabetic drug (OAD)-treated T2D patients in South Kivu (Democratic Republic of the Congo) with [Cassava (+); n=147] and without [Cassava (-); n=46] self-reported cassava consumption.
DESIGN & METHODS: A total of 193 patients [male:female (%) 37:63; mean +/-1 SD age: 56+/-11 years] were interviewed to determine the frequency and distribution of eight major dietary carbohydrate (CHO) sources (cassava, plantain, rice, maize, bread, sorghum, potatoes and legumes). Fasting glucose, insulin and lipid levels were obtained after an overnight fast and OAD discontinuation. Cassava (+) and Cassava (-) groups were compared for HOMA indices of insulin sensitivity (S), beta-cell function (B), hyperbolic product (B x S) and B x S loss rate (B x S LR).
Diabetes duration was 6+/-7 years, age at diabetes diagnosis was 51+/-11 years and BMI was 25+/-5 kg/m(2). Cassava intake was reported by 76% of patients, and amounted to 29+/-11% of their daily CHO intake. The Cassava (-) group ate more plantain, maize, bread and potatoes, and less sorghum. Age, gender and age at diabetes diagnosis did not differ between Cassava (+) and (-) patients, nor did BMI, fat mass, waist circumference, lipid profile and metabolic syndrome prevalence. HOMA indices of S, B, B x S and B x S LR did not differ significantly between groups-Cassava (+) vs (-): S, 114+/-56% vs 114+/-60%; B, 34+/-30% vs 39+/-32%; B x S, 38+/-35% vs 40+/-31%; and B x S LR, 1.19+/-0.84% vs 1.09+/-0.65% per year-nor did the glucose-lowering modalities.
Cassava consumption in South Kivu is not associated with changes in T2D phenotype or in the glucose homoeostasis determinants S, B, B x S and B x S LR. Cassava consumption does not accelerate beta-cell function loss in such a population, whose markedly compromised glucose homoeostasis renders them vulnerable to environmentally acquired beta-cell impairment.
木薯是非洲的主要碳水化合物来源,其中含有潜在的致糖尿病化学物质,尽管其食用与糖尿病的发生无关。由于尚不清楚木薯的摄入是否会损害 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的残余β细胞功能,我们的研究比较了南基伍(刚果民主共和国)饮食和/或口服抗糖尿病药物(OAD)治疗的 T2D 患者的代谢表型,这些患者有[木薯(+); n=147]和无[木薯(-); n=46]自我报告的木薯食用情况。
共有 193 名患者[男性:女性(%)37:63;平均年龄+/-1 SD:56+/-11 岁]接受采访,以确定八种主要膳食碳水化合物(CHO)来源(木薯,大蕉,大米,玉米,面包,高粱,土豆和豆类)的频率和分布。禁食过夜和停用 OAD 后,获得空腹血糖,胰岛素和血脂水平。比较木薯(+)和木薯(-)组的胰岛素敏感性(S),β细胞功能(B),双曲乘积(B x S)和 B x S 损失率(B x S LR)的 HOMA 指数。
糖尿病病程为 6+/-7 年,糖尿病诊断年龄为 51+/-11 岁,BMI 为 25+/-5 kg/m2。76%的患者报告了木薯的摄入量,占其每日 CHO 摄入量的 29+/-11%。木薯(-)组食用更多的大蕉,玉米,面包和土豆,而食用更少的高粱。木薯(+)和(-)患者的年龄,性别和糖尿病诊断年龄无差异,BMI,脂肪量,腰围,血脂谱和代谢综合征的患病率也无差异。两组之间的 S,B,B x S 和 B x S LR 的 HOMA 指数差异无统计学意义-木薯(+)与(-):S,114+/-56%比 114+/-60%; B,34+/-30%比 39+/-32%; B x S,38+/-35%比 40+/-31%; B x S LR,1.19+/-0.84%比 1.09+/-0.65%/年-血糖降低方式也无差异。
在南基伍,木薯的食用与 T2D 表型或葡萄糖稳态决定因素 S,B,B x S 和 B x S LR 的变化无关。木薯的食用不会加速β细胞功能的丧失,因为该人群的葡萄糖稳态明显受损,使他们容易受到环境获得的β细胞损害。