Secades-Villa Roberto, Alonso-Pérez Fernando, García-Rodríguez Olaya, Fernández-Hermida José Ramón
Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Spain.
Psychol Rep. 2009 Dec;105(3 Pt 1):747-58. doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.3.747-758.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three smoking cessation programs of varying intensity applied in a primary care setting. Participants were 89 individuals randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: brief counseling plus information pamphlet, self-help program with telephone follow-up, and intensive behavioral treatment. At the 12-mo. follow-up, intensive behavioral treatment (42.8% abstinence) was more effective than the self-help program (27.5%), which was in turn more effective than counseling (12.9%). Continued abstinence was also higher in the intensive treatment group (37.9%) than in the self-help (17.2%) and the counseling groups (9.7%), although these differences only reached statistical significance in the first and third of these groups. Treatment adherence was higher in the intensive behavioral group (82.8% of participants attended all the sessions) than in the self-help group (61.8% completed the program). The results appear to confirm a dose-response effect in the treatment of smokers and indicate satisfactory acceptability of intensive behavioral programs applied in primary care.
本研究的目的是比较在初级保健环境中应用的三种不同强度戒烟项目的效果。89名参与者被随机分配到三个治疗组之一:简短咨询加信息手册、有电话随访的自助项目以及强化行为治疗。在12个月的随访中,强化行为治疗(42.8%的戒烟率)比自助项目(27.5%)更有效,而自助项目又比咨询(12.9%)更有效。强化治疗组(37.9%)的持续戒烟率也高于自助组(17.2%)和咨询组(9.7%),不过这些差异仅在第一组和第三组中具有统计学意义。强化行为组的治疗依从性(82.8%的参与者参加了所有疗程)高于自助组(61.8%完成了该项目)。结果似乎证实了在吸烟者治疗中的剂量反应效应,并表明在初级保健中应用的强化行为项目具有令人满意的可接受性。