Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Hippocampus. 2011 May;21(5):520-31. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20769.
Both natural and synthetic cannabinoid receptor (e.g., CB1) agonists such as Δ(9)-THC, WIN 55,212-2 (WIN-2), and HU-210 disrupt spatial cognition presumably through the inhibition of synchrony of hippocampal ensemble firing to task-related events. Although the CB1 receptor agonist CP 55,940 also disrupts the synchronous firing of hippocampal neurons, it does not seem to affect the average firing rate. This difference is not readily explained by the chemical structure and pharmacology of the different compounds thus warranting a more detailed examination into (i) how other cannabinoids affect the spontaneous firing, bursting, and cell synchrony of hippocampal principal cells located in CA3 and CA1 subfields, and (ii) whether these effects are indeed mediated through CB1 receptors, which will be explored by the selective antagonist AM-251. Male Long-Evans rats surgically implanted with multielectrode arrays to hippocampal CA3 and CA1 were anesthetized and principal cells discharging at 0.25-6.0 Hz were isolated and "tracked" following the systemic administration of Tween-80, Δ(9)-THC (1 or 3 mg/kg) or WIN-2 (1 mg/kg) or HU-210 (100 μg/kg), and 1.5 mg/kg AM-281. All cannabinoids except for 1 mg/kg Δ(9) -THC reliably reduced average firing rates and altered "burst" characteristics, which were reversible with AM-281 for Δ(9)-THC and WIN-2 but not for HU-210. In addition, all cannabinoids disrupted intrasubfield and intersubfield ensemble synchrony of pyramidal cells, which is an effect insensitive to AM-281 and thus unlikely to be CB1 mediated. We consider these cannabinoid effects on spike timing and firing/bursting of principal hippocampal neurons carried by CB1 and non-CB1 receptors to be physiological underpinnings of the cognitive impairments inherent to cannabinoid exposure.
天然和合成大麻素受体(例如 CB1)激动剂,如 Δ(9)-THC、WIN 55,212-2(WIN-2)和 HU-210,通过抑制海马神经元群体对与任务相关事件的同步放电,破坏空间认知。尽管 CB1 受体激动剂 CP 55,940 也破坏海马神经元的同步放电,但它似乎不影响平均放电率。这种差异不能用不同化合物的化学结构和药理学很容易地解释,因此需要更详细地研究(i)其他大麻素如何影响位于 CA3 和 CA1 亚区的海马主要神经元的自发放电、爆发和细胞同步性,以及(ii)这些效应是否确实通过 CB1 受体介导,这将通过选择性拮抗剂 AM-251 来探索。雄性 Long-Evans 大鼠接受多电极阵列植入手术以进入海马 CA3 和 CA1 区,然后在全身给予 Tween-80、Δ(9)-THC(1 或 3 mg/kg)或 WIN-2(1 mg/kg)或 HU-210(100 μg/kg)后进行麻醉,并分离出以 0.25-6.0 Hz 放电的主要细胞,并在给予 1.5 mg/kg AM-281 后对其进行“跟踪”。除了 1 mg/kg Δ(9)-THC 之外,所有大麻素都可靠地降低了平均放电率,并改变了“爆发”特征,这些变化可以通过 AM-281 逆转,对于 Δ(9)-THC 和 WIN-2,但不能用于 HU-210。此外,所有大麻素都破坏了海马锥体细胞的亚区内和亚区间的整体同步性,这种效应对 AM-281 不敏感,因此不太可能通过 CB1 介导。我们认为这些大麻素对主要海马神经元的尖峰定时和放电/爆发的影响,是大麻素暴露固有认知障碍的生理基础。