Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂和钙通道阻滞剂对原发性高血压患者肾血管阻力的影响。

Influence of ATII blockers and calcium channel blockers on renal vascular resistance in patients with essential hypertension.

作者信息

Delić-Brkljacić Diana, Galesić Kresimir, Ivanac Gordana, Manola Sime, Pintarić Hrvoje, Stambuk Kresimir, Gaćina Petar, Radeljić Vjekoslav

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Sestre milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Coll Antropol. 2009 Dec;33(4):1129-38.

Abstract

Doppler can evaluate renal vascular resistance, and resistance index (RI) highly correlates with blood pressure and renal function in various pathological conditions. Purpose of the study was to measure and compare renal Doppler indices in patients with newly-diagnosed essential hypertension (EH) and in healthy subjects; to determine changes of Doppler indices in patients after six-months monotherapy with either the AT II blocker (valsartane) or calcium channel blocker (niphedipine); to determine which drug has better renoprotective effect. 65 healthy controls were examined, as well as 69 patients with the newly-diagnosed EH, without signs of the target organ damage. Duplex Doppler US of interlobar intrarenal arteries was performed, and RI, acceleration index (AI) and acceleration time (AT) measured. Antihypertensive monotherapy was performed with vaslartane in 34 patients and with niphedipine in 35 patients. Doppler was repeated after the six-months therapy. RI in patients with the 1. stage of EH is significantly higher compared to the controls (p < 0.001), and significantly lower compared to the stage 2. of EH (p < 0.001). The significant decrease of systolic (p < 0.001) and dyastolic blood pressure (BP) (p < 0.001) was noted after the therapy. RI in healthy examinees (RI = 0.59 +/- 0.023) is significantly lower than in EH (RI = 0.66 +/- 0.26) (p < 0.001), while AI is significantly higher (p < 0.001), and AT is significantly lower (p < 0.001). In patients treated with valsartane and those treated with niphedipine, the RIs are significantly lower than before (p < 0.001), while AIs were significantly higher, and ATs were significantly lower after the therapy after the therapy with both drugs. RIs in patients treated with valsartane (RI = 0.615 +/- 0.036) are significantly lower than RIs of patients treated with niphedipine (RI = 0.642 +/- 0.030) (p < 0.01) after therapy. Regression analysis for the predictive values of RI, AT, AI in relation to the age-standardized values of systolic and diastolic BP of healthy examinees and patients with hypertension has demonstrated that RI is the strongest and statistically significant predictor in all groups of examinees. Six-months monotherapy of EH with valsartane or with niphedipine is equally efficient in the decrease of the blood pressure, but valsartane has more favourable effect on kidney. Resistance index measured in intrarenal arteries is the best parameter of Doppler spectrum in the evaluation of the effects of antihypertensive therapy on the kidney.

摘要

多普勒超声可评估肾血管阻力,在各种病理情况下,阻力指数(RI)与血压及肾功能高度相关。本研究的目的是测量并比较新诊断的原发性高血压(EH)患者和健康受试者的肾多普勒指数;确定使用血管紧张素II阻滞剂(缬沙坦)或钙通道阻滞剂(硝苯地平)进行六个月单一疗法后患者多普勒指数的变化;确定哪种药物具有更好的肾脏保护作用。研究检查了65名健康对照者以及69名新诊断的EH患者,这些患者均无靶器官损害迹象。对肾叶间动脉进行了双功多普勒超声检查,并测量了RI、加速指数(AI)和加速时间(AT)。34例患者使用缬沙坦进行抗高血压单一疗法,35例患者使用硝苯地平进行抗高血压单一疗法。六个月治疗后重复进行多普勒超声检查。EH 1期患者的RI显著高于对照组(p<0.001),但显著低于EH 2期患者(p<0.001)。治疗后收缩压(p<0.001)和舒张压(BP)(p<0.001)显著下降。健康受试者的RI(RI = 0.59±0.023)显著低于EH患者(RI = 0.66±0.26)(p<0.001),而AI显著更高(p<0.001),AT显著更低(p<0.001)。使用缬沙坦治疗的患者和使用硝苯地平治疗的患者,治疗后的RI均显著低于治疗前(p<0.001),而AI显著更高,AT显著更低。治疗后,使用缬沙坦治疗的患者的RI(RI = 0.615±0.036)显著低于使用硝苯地平治疗的患者的RI(RI = 0.642±0.030)(p<0.01)。对健康受试者和高血压患者的RI、AT、AI相对于收缩压和舒张压的年龄标准化值的预测值进行回归分析表明,RI在所有受试者组中是最强且具有统计学意义的预测指标。使用缬沙坦或硝苯地平对EH进行六个月的单一疗法在降低血压方面同样有效,但缬沙坦对肾脏有更有利的影响。肾叶间动脉测量的阻力指数是评估抗高血压治疗对肾脏影响的多普勒频谱的最佳参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验