Passalacqua Nicholas V
Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 2010 Mar 1;55(2):482-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01287.x. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
Accurate age-at-death estimates are crucial to forensic anthropologists when onstructing biological profiles aimed at narrowing a missing-persons list and to allow for timely and efficient identification of an unknown victim. The present contribution evaluates the utility of three new age-at-death estimation techniques recently proposed by Samworth and Gowland (2007). Results indicate that, in the samples under study, the Samworth and Gowland estimates from the pubic symphysis and auricular surface perform similar to alternate phase methods. The combined method does not appear to further enhance either the precision or the accuracy of the single pubic symphysis age-at-death estimate. In conclusion, these new methods seem to be more robust to distribution deviations than originally proposed by Samworth and Gowland (2007). They are therefore suitable for immediate and reliable forensic usage in the United States and worthy of further research for their use in North American forensic contexts.
准确的死亡年龄估计对于法医人类学家构建生物特征资料至关重要,这些资料旨在缩小失踪人员名单范围,并及时、高效地识别身份不明的受害者。本论文评估了Samworth和Gowland(2007年)最近提出的三种新的死亡年龄估计技术的效用。结果表明,在所研究的样本中,来自耻骨联合和耳状面的Samworth和Gowland估计值与其他阶段方法的表现相似。联合方法似乎并未进一步提高单一耻骨联合死亡年龄估计的精度或准确性。总之,这些新方法似乎比Samworth和Gowland(2007年)最初提出的方法对分布偏差更具稳健性。因此,它们适用于美国即时可靠的法医用途,并且值得在北美法医环境中进一步研究其应用。