Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Health Econ. 2011 Jan;20(1):27-44. doi: 10.1002/hec.1571. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
Because less healthy employees value health insurance more than the healthy ones, when health insurance is newly offered job turnover rates for healthier employees decline less than turnover rates for the less healthy. We call this adverse job turnover, and it implies that a firm's expected health costs will increase when health insurance is first offered. Health insurance premiums may fail to adjust sufficiently fast because state regulations restrict annual premium changes, or insurers are reluctant to change premiums rapidly. Even with premiums set at the long run expected costs, some firms may be charged premiums higher than their current expected costs and choose not to offer insurance. High administrative costs at small firms exacerbate this dynamic selection problem. Using 1998-1999 MEDSTAT MarketScan and 1997 Employer Health Insurance Survey data, we find that expected employee health expenditures at firms that offer insurance have lower within-firm and higher between-firm variance than at firms that do not. Turnover rates are systematically higher in industries in which firms are less likely to offer insurance. Simulations of the offer decision capturing between-firm health-cost heterogeneity and expected turnover rates match the observed pattern across firm sizes well.
由于健康状况较差的员工比健康状况较好的员工更看重健康保险,因此当新提供健康保险时,健康状况较好的员工的离职率下降幅度低于健康状况较差的员工。我们称这种情况为不利的员工离职,这意味着当首次提供健康保险时,公司的预期医疗费用将会增加。健康保险费可能无法调整得足够快,因为州法规限制了年度保费变化,或者保险公司不愿意迅速调整保费。即使保费设定在长期预期成本上,一些公司的保费可能高于其当前的预期成本,并选择不提供保险。小型公司的高管理成本加剧了这种动态选择问题。利用 1998-1999 年 MEDSTAT MarketScan 和 1997 年雇主健康保险调查数据,我们发现,提供保险的公司的预期员工医疗支出在公司内部的差异较小,而在公司之间的差异较大,低于不提供保险的公司。在那些不太可能提供保险的行业中,员工离职率系统性地更高。捕捉公司间健康成本异质性和预期离职率的提供决策模拟很好地匹配了不同规模公司的观察模式。