• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

致命性哮喘的心理和自我管理因素。

Psychological and self-management factors in near-fatal asthma.

机构信息

Departamento de Psicología Clínica y Psicobiología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2010 Feb;68(2):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.012. Epub 2009 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.012
PMID:20105700
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies that have analyzed differences in psychological and self-management variables between patients with a near-fatal asthma (NFA) attack and asthmatics without a NFA attack (non-NFA) have shown conflicting results, probably due to the heterogeneity of the events studied and the selection of comparison groups.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether NFA patients, in stable situation, have greater psychological morbidity and worse self-management behavior than non-NFA patients with similar sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

METHODS

A sample of 44 NFA patients (mean=5.65 years after the NFA episode) and 44 non-NFA patients matched for age, sex, and asthma severity was assessed. All patients were in clinical stable situation. Information about sociodemographic, clinical, functional, and morbidity variables was collected for each patient, and the Cognitive Depression Inventory, the Trait-Anxiety Scale, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, the Practical Knowledge of Self-management questionnaire, and the Medication Adherence scale were administered.

RESULTS

In comparison with non-NFA patients, NFA patients showed higher levels of trait-anxiety (23.84 vs. 16.86; P=.001) and more difficulties describing and communicating feelings (11.36 vs. 8.90; P=.002). NFA and non-NFA patients did not differ in self-management variables. After adjustment in multivariate logistic regression analysis for age, sex, and asthma severity, significant differences were observed between NFA and control group patients in marital status [odds ratio (OR)=0.26; P=.017; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.09-0.78], prescribed dose of inhaled corticoids (OR=4.48; P=.006;95% CI=1.53-13.09), and trait-anxiety (OR=1.071;P=.025;95%CI=1.01-1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

NFA patients show higher psychological morbidity than non-NFA, even years after the NFA episode.

摘要

背景

多项分析有濒死性哮喘(near-fatal asthma,NFA)发作和无 NFA 发作哮喘患者心理和自我管理变量差异的研究结果存在矛盾,这可能是由于所研究事件的异质性和对照组的选择不同所致。

目的

确定在稳定状态下,NFA 患者是否比具有相似社会人口统计学和临床特征的非 NFA 患者有更大的心理病态和更差的自我管理行为。

方法

对 44 名 NFA 患者(NFA 发作后平均 5.65 年)和 44 名非 NFA 患者进行了样本匹配,比较了年龄、性别和哮喘严重程度。所有患者均处于临床稳定状态。收集每位患者的社会人口学、临床、功能和发病变量信息,并进行认知抑郁量表、特质焦虑量表、多伦多述情障碍量表、自我管理实用知识问卷和药物依从性量表评估。

结果

与非 NFA 患者相比,NFA 患者表现出更高的特质焦虑(23.84 比 16.86;P=.001)和更难以描述和表达情感(11.36 比 8.90;P=.002)。NFA 和非 NFA 患者在自我管理变量方面没有差异。在多元逻辑回归分析中,调整年龄、性别和哮喘严重程度后,NFA 组和对照组患者在婚姻状况[比值比(odds ratio,OR)=0.26;P=.017;95%置信区间(confidence interval,CI)=0.09-0.78]、吸入皮质激素的处方剂量(OR=4.48;P=.006;95%CI=1.53-13.09)和特质焦虑(OR=1.071;P=.025;95%CI=1.01-1.14)方面存在显著差异。

结论

即使在 NFA 发作多年后,NFA 患者的心理病态也高于非 NFA 患者。

相似文献

1
Psychological and self-management factors in near-fatal asthma.致命性哮喘的心理和自我管理因素。
J Psychosom Res. 2010 Feb;68(2):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.012. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
2
The impact of alexithymia on asthma patient management and communication with health care providers: a pilot study.述情障碍对哮喘患者管理及与医护人员沟通的影响:一项试点研究。
J Asthma. 2009 Mar;46(2):126-9. doi: 10.1080/02770900802468525.
3
Control of ventilation, breathlessness perception and alexithymia in near-fatal asthma.近致死性哮喘的通气控制、呼吸困难感知与述情障碍
J Asthma. 2006 Oct;43(8):639-44. doi: 10.1080/02770900600878990.
4
The role of alexithymia in quality of life and health care use in asthma.述情障碍在哮喘患者生活质量及医疗保健利用中的作用。
J Asthma. 2010 Sep;47(7):797-804. doi: 10.3109/02770900903560217.
5
Alexithymia: a relevant psychological variable in near-fatal asthma.述情障碍:近致命性哮喘中的一个相关心理变量。
Eur Respir J. 2006 Aug;28(2):296-302. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00008105. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
6
Prescription of oral corticosteroids in near-fatal asthma patients: relationship with panic-fear, anxiety and depression.近致命性哮喘患者口服糖皮质激素的处方:与惊恐恐惧、焦虑和抑郁的关系。
Scand J Psychol. 2005 Oct;46(5):459-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00477.x.
7
Contribution of aspirin-intolerant asthma to near fatal asthma based on a questionnaire survey in Niigata Prefecture, Japan.基于日本新潟县的问卷调查探讨阿司匹林不耐受性哮喘对濒死性哮喘的影响。
Respirology. 2005 Sep;10(4):477-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2005.00740.x.
8
Risk factors for intensive care in children with acute asthma.急性哮喘患儿重症监护的危险因素。
Respirology. 2005 Sep;10(4):436-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2005.00726.x.
9
Clinician-assessed poor compliance identifies adults with severe asthma who are at risk of adverse outcomes.临床医生评估的依从性差可识别出有不良结局风险的重度哮喘成年患者。
J Asthma. 2005 Jul-Aug;42(6):437-45. doi: 10.1081/JAS-67949.
10
A psychological comparison of temporomandibular disorder and chronic daily headache: are there targets for therapeutic interventions?颞下颌关节紊乱症与慢性每日头痛的心理学比较:是否存在治疗干预靶点?
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Mar;103(3):367-73. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.07.014. Epub 2006 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of different follow-up management on asthma control: a prospective cohort study.不同随访管理对哮喘控制的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03771-1.
2
Alexithymia and asthma: a systematic review.述情障碍与哮喘:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 7;14:1221648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1221648. eCollection 2023.
3
Patient-centered care and its effect on outcomes in the treatment of asthma.以患者为中心的护理及其对哮喘治疗结果的影响。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2011 Jul;2:81-109. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S12634. Epub 2011 Mar 6.
4
Revisiting causality in psychosomatic research.重新审视身心医学研究中的因果关系。
J Psychosom Res. 2010 Feb;68(2):105-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.11.007.