Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse 33, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Dec;23(4):441-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2009.08.002.
Hyperglycaemia and glucose variability occur frequently during critical illness or after major surgery in children and are associated with worse outcome. Association does not necessarily imply causality however, and the question whether tight glycaemic control (TGC) with insulin infusion improves morbidity and mortality can only be answered by randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Currently, only one single-centre RCT exists, proving the concept of TGC in critically ill children. Attenuation of inflammation and reduction of secondary infections, decreased prolonged stay in intensive care and reduced dependency on haemodynamic support were accomplished, despite a substantial increased incidence of biochemical hypoglycaemia. Before universal implementation in paediatric intensive care both long-term effects on outcome and development and issues regarding optimal levels of blood glucose control need to be cleared in multicentre prospective RCTs. Technological improvement might be helpful in optimising blood glucose control.
高血糖和血糖变异性在儿童重症疾病或大手术后经常发生,并与更差的预后相关。然而,关联并不一定意味着因果关系,胰岛素输注的严格血糖控制(TGC)是否能改善发病率和死亡率,只能通过随机对照试验(RCT)来回答。目前,仅存在一项单中心 RCT,证明了 TGC 在重症儿童中的概念。尽管生化性低血糖的发生率显著增加,但仍实现了减轻炎症和减少继发性感染、减少重症监护时间延长以及减少对血流动力学支持的依赖。在儿科重症监护中普遍实施之前,需要在多中心前瞻性 RCT 中明确长期对结果和发育的影响,以及血糖控制的最佳水平问题。技术改进可能有助于优化血糖控制。